220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14695013)
1. Evaluation of patient and staff doses during various CT fluoroscopy guided interventions.
Carlson SK
Health Phys; 2004 Jan; 86(1):95-6; author reply 96. PubMed ID: 14695013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of patient and staff doses during various CT fluoroscopy guided interventions.
Buls N; Pagés J; de Mey J; Osteaux M
Health Phys; 2003 Aug; 85(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 12938963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PET/CT-guided interventions: personnel radiation dose.
Ryan ER; Thornton R; Sofocleous CT; Erinjeri JP; Hsu M; Quinn B; Dauer LT; Solomon SB
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):1063-7. PubMed ID: 23229891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ASSESSMENT ON THE INTERCHANGEABILITY OF PERSONAL EFFECTIVE DOSE ALGORITHMS IN FLUOROSCOPY-GUIDED INTERVENTIONS USING BLAND-ALTMAN ANALYSIS.
Bohari A; Hashim S; Ghoshal SK; Mohd Mustafa SN
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 186(4):462-468. PubMed ID: 31329977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical Staff Radiation Protection During Fluoroscopy-Guided Urologic Interventions.
Galonnier F; Traxer O; Rosec M; Terrasa JB; Gouezel P; Celier D; Bassinet C; Ruffion A; Paparel P; Fiard G; Terrier JE
J Endourol; 2016 Jun; 30(6):638-43. PubMed ID: 26987619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Thermoluminescent dosimetry in veterinary diagnostic radiology.
Hernández-Ruiz L; Jimenez-Flores Y; Rivera-Montalvo T; Arias-Cisneros L; Méndez-Aguilar RE; Uribe-Izquierdo P
Appl Radiat Isot; 2012 Dec; 71 Suppl():44-7. PubMed ID: 22917941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interventional radiologists: a necessary evolution of leaded protective aprons design.
Guersen J; Cassagnes L; Mechin G; Ravel A; Dumousset E; Boyer L; Chabrot P
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):443. PubMed ID: 23433419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Occupational Exposure and Adverse Effects in the Radiologic Interventional Setting.
Walden C
Radiol Technol; 2016; 87(4):460-4. PubMed ID: 26952068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Procedures, spectrum and radiation exposure in CT-fluoroscopy].
Stoeckelhuber BM; Schulz E; Melchert UH; Blobel J; Gellissen J; Gehl H; Weiss HD; Leibecke T
Rontgenpraxis; 2003; 55(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 14618963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three decades of occupational individual monitoring at the University of São Paulo.
Okuno E; Umisedo NK; Cancio FS; Aldred MA; Yoshimura EM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Dec; 177(3):285-288. PubMed ID: 28402564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimisation of occupational radiological protection in image-guided interventions: potential impact of dose rate measurements.
Almén A; Sandblom V; Båth M; Lundh C
J Radiol Prot; 2015 Mar; 35(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 25517218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined Use of a Patient Dose Monitoring System and a Real-Time Occupational Dose Monitoring System for Fluoroscopically Guided Interventions.
Heilmaier C; Kara L; Zuber N; Berthold C; Weishaupt D
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Apr; 27(4):584-92. PubMed ID: 26724965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clarifying and visualizing sources of staff-received scattered radiation in interventional procedures.
Chida K; Takahashi T; Ito D; Shimura H; Takeda K; Zuguchi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):W900-3. PubMed ID: 22021539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of patient and occupational dose in established and new applications of MDCT fluoroscopy.
Joemai RM; Zweers D; Obermann WR; Geleijns J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):881-6. PubMed ID: 19304690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comments on 'Increasing film-focus distance (FFD) reduces radiation dose for X-ray examinations' by P.C. Brennan, S. McDonnell and D. O'Leary.
Huda W; Ogden KM; Brennan PC; O'Leary D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(4):453-5. PubMed ID: 15769801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous vertebroplasty: assessment of radiation doses and implementation of procedural routines to reduce operator exposure.
von Wrangel A; Cederblad A; Rodriguez-Catarino M
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jun; 50(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19363715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dual guidance (CT and fluoroscopy) vertebroplasty: radiation dose to radiologists. How much and where?
Amoretti N; Lesbats V; Marcy PY; Hauger O; Amoretti ME; Maratos Y; Ianessi A; Boileau P
Skeletal Radiol; 2010 Dec; 39(12):1229-35. PubMed ID: 20496066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduction of occupational radiation dose in staff at the cardiac catheterisation laboratory by protective material placed on the patient.
Ordiales JM; Nogales JM; Sánchez-Casanueva R; Vano E; Fernández JM; Álvarez FJ; Ramos J; Martínez G; López-Mínguez JR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):272-5. PubMed ID: 25848096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation-Induced Skin Injuries to Patients: What the Interventional Radiologist Needs to Know.
Jaschke W; Schmuth M; Trianni A; Bartal G
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2017 Aug; 40(8):1131-1140. PubMed ID: 28497187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deriving staff and public doses in a PET/CT facility from measured radiation levels using thermoluminescent dosimetry.
Al-Haj AN; Lobriguito AM; Arafah A; Parker R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):487-91. PubMed ID: 21147788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]