These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14695105)

  • 1. Protecting subjects with decisional impairment in research: the need for a multifaceted approach.
    Silverman HJ; Luce JM; Schwartz J
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2004 Jan; 169(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 14695105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The forum. Competence to consent to research: where psychology, ethics, and the law intersect.
    Rosenfeld B
    Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(3):284-7. PubMed ID: 12656073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term, assenting psychiatric patients: decisional capacity and the quality of care.
    Hoge SK; Feucht-Haviar TC
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 8845525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new brief instrument for assessing decisional capacity for clinical research.
    Jeste DV; Palmer BW; Appelbaum PS; Golshan S; Glorioso D; Dunn LB; Kim K; Meeks T; Kraemer HC
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2007 Aug; 64(8):966-74. PubMed ID: 17679641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Competency to refuse psychotropic medication: three alternatives to the law's cognitive standard.
    Saks ER
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1993 Jan; 47(3):689-761. PubMed ID: 16617526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Capacity of forensic patients to consent to research: the use of the MacCAT-CR.
    McDermott BE; Gerbasi JB; Quanbeck C; Scott CL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 16186191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The forum. Autonomy, beneficence, and justice in the wider context.
    Walker MU
    Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(3):279-80, 291-3. PubMed ID: 12656076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity--executive summary.
    US National Bioethics Advisory Commission
    J Int Bioethique; 2002 Mar; 13(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 15038373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How is informed consent related to emotions and empathy? An exploratory neuroethical investigation.
    Supady A; Voelkel A; Witzel J; Gubka U; Northoff G
    J Med Ethics; 2011 May; 37(5):311-7. PubMed ID: 21393363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The forum. What theological understandings contribute to protecting mentally impaired persons in medical treatment and research.
    McKenzie DM
    Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(3):279-80, 287-90. PubMed ID: 12656074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coercion and informed consent in research involving prisoners.
    Moser DJ; Arndt S; Kanz JE; Benjamin ML; Bayless JD; Reese RL; Paulsen JS; Flaum MA
    Compr Psychiatry; 2004; 45(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 14671730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How can valid informed consent be obtained from a psychotic patient for research into psychosis? Three perspectives.
    Freckelton I; Keks N; Howe V; Foister K; Jenkins K; Copolov D; Sullivan D
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2003 Oct; 22(4):60-75. PubMed ID: 15069966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The psychology of competence and informed consent: understanding decision-making with regard to clinical practice.
    Rosenfeld B
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):173-85. PubMed ID: 15868668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of capacity to consent to research among older persons with schizophrenia, Alzheimer disease, or diabetes mellitus: comparison of a 3-item questionnaire with a comprehensive standardized capacity instrument.
    Palmer BW; Dunn LB; Appelbaum PS; Mudaliar S; Thal L; Henry R; Golshan S; Jeste DV
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2005 Jul; 62(7):726-33. PubMed ID: 15997013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Commentary: on research and forensic patients' capacity.
    Lamb HR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):308-9. PubMed ID: 16186192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protecting the vulnerable in brain research.
    Cook-Deegan RM
    Cerebrum; 2000; 2(2):73-91. PubMed ID: 15986545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The subject advocate: protecting the interests of participants with fluctuating decisionmaking capacity.
    Stroup S; Appelbaum P
    IRB; 2003; 25(3):9-11. PubMed ID: 14569988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constructing competence: formulating standards of legal competence to make medical decisions.
    Berg JW; Appelbaum PS; Grisso T
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1996; 48(2):345-71. PubMed ID: 16086484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In harm's way: research subjects who are decisionally impaired.
    Sundram CJ
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):36-65. PubMed ID: 15573429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bipolar mania and capacity to consent: recommendations for investigators and IRBs.
    Misra S; Rosenstein D; Socherman R; Ganzini L
    IRB; 2010; 32(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 20184219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.