127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14695640)
1. Effects and non-effects of paired identical observations in comparing proportions with binary matched-pairs data.
Agresti A; Min Y
Stat Med; 2004 Jan; 23(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 14695640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects and non-effects of paired identical observations in comparing proportions with binary matched-pairs data.
Wittkowski KM
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2317. PubMed ID: 15236433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A method for comparing positive rates of two blood culture systems.
Qu Y; Easley KA
Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1513-9. PubMed ID: 9423266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficient experimental design for binary matched pairs data.
Lennox KP; Sherman M
Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):2952-66. PubMed ID: 19691023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One relative risk versus two odds ratios: implications for meta-analyses involving paired and unpaired binary data.
Zou GY
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 17327243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simple improved confidence intervals for comparing matched proportions.
Agresti A; Min Y
Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(5):729-40. PubMed ID: 15696504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The conditional relative odds ratio provided less biased results for comparing diagnostic test accuracy in meta-analyses.
Suzuki S; Moro-oka T; Choudhry NK
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 May; 57(5):461-9. PubMed ID: 15196616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extending McNemar's test: estimation and inference when paired binary outcome data are misclassified.
Lyles RH; Williamson JM; Lin HM; Heilig CM
Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):287-94. PubMed ID: 15737105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating treatment efficacy over time: a logistic regression model for binary longitudinal outcomes.
Choi L; Dominici F; Zeger SL; Ouyang P
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2789-805. PubMed ID: 16134133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of matched case-control data with incomplete strata: applying longitudinal approaches.
Lin IF; Lai MY; Chuang PH
Epidemiology; 2007 Jul; 18(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 17525695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multivariate extensions of McNemar's test.
Klingenberg B; Agresti A
Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):921-8. PubMed ID: 16984337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of the common risk difference in stratified paired binary data with homogeneous stratum effect.
Zhao YD; Rahardja D
J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(4):848-55. PubMed ID: 23786205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing homogeneity of stratum effects in stratified paired binary data.
Zhao YD; Rahardja D; Wang DH; Shen H
J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):600-7. PubMed ID: 24697196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genotypic association analysis using discordant-relative-pairs.
Yan T; Yang YN; Cheng X; DeAngelis MM; Hoh J; Zhang H
Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Jan; 73(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 19040657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship of lead, mercury, mirex, dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene, hexachlorobenzene, and polychlorinated biphenyls to timing of menarche among Akwesasne Mohawk girls.
Denham M; Schell LM; Deane G; Gallo MV; Ravenscroft J; DeCaprio AP;
Pediatrics; 2005 Feb; 115(2):e127-34. PubMed ID: 15653789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling association in longitudinal binary outcomes: a brief review.
Kuchibhatla M; Fillenbaum GG
Aging Ment Health; 2005 May; 9(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 16019273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian analysis of misclassified binary data from a matched case-control study with a validation sub-study.
Prescott GJ; Garthwaite PH
Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):379-401. PubMed ID: 15565740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new non-randomized model for analysing sensitive questions with binary outcomes.
Tian GL; Yu JW; Tang ML; Geng Z
Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4238-52. PubMed ID: 17351882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitivity analysis for m-estimates, tests, and confidence intervals in matched observational studies.
Rosenbaum PR
Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):456-64. PubMed ID: 17688498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian approach to average power calculations for binary regression models with misclassified outcomes.
Cheng D; Stamey JD; Branscum AJ
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):848-63. PubMed ID: 19061210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
