These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14696290)

  • 1. A court case that could galvanize a field. Raytheon v. Hernandez.
    de Miranda J
    Behav Healthc Tomorrow; 2003 Dec; 12(6):16-21. PubMed ID: 14696290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Supreme court reviews drug addiction case.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2004; 15(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 15026764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Americans with Disabilities Act: disabled by court decisions.
    Coelho T
    Neurology; 2007 May; 68(20):1733-6. PubMed ID: 17502557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ADA: Supreme Court disallows disparate impact analysis of facially valid employment procedures.
    Walter S
    J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(2):373-5. PubMed ID: 15301205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supreme court agrees to define employer.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2003; 14(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 12532074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supreme Court gives strict interpretation to Disabilities Act language. Toyota Motor Manufacturing v. Williams.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2002 May; 19(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11989435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Regarded as" disabled.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2005; 16(4):29-33. PubMed ID: 16061156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Americans with Disabilities Act at 25: the highest expression of American values.
    Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2015 Jun; 313(22):2231-5. PubMed ID: 26057283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. U.S. Supreme Court to review drug addiction case.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2003; 14(5):26-9. PubMed ID: 14593342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Employers' obligation to provide reasonable accommodation.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2002; 13(6):24-6. PubMed ID: 12439458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mandatory reassignment under the ADA: the circuit split and need for a socio-political understanding of disability.
    Dorsey NA
    Cornell Law Rev; 2009 Jan; 94(2):443-78. PubMed ID: 19288614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extending the ADA to HIV. High court rules afflicted workers are covered by act.
    Rauber C
    Mod Healthc; 1998 Jul; 28(28):26, 28. PubMed ID: 10181357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Emphasis on employment.
    Monarch K
    Okla Nurse; 1997; 42(1):11. PubMed ID: 9326052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Americans with Disabilities Act: shattered aspirations and new hope.
    Thomas VL; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2009 Jan; 301(1):95-7. PubMed ID: 19126814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Supreme Court's Burlington Decision: implications for the health care workplace.
    Spevak C
    Physician Exec; 2007; 33(2):62-4. PubMed ID: 17458385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Employment protections.
    Feldblum CR
    Milbank Q; 1991; 69 Suppl 1-2():81-110. PubMed ID: 1837840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Americans with Disabilities Act: implications of Supreme Court decisions for case managers. Part IV.
    Vierling L
    Case Manager; 2000; 11(4):51-5. PubMed ID: 11935612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Civil Rights Act of 1991.
    Siegel P; Sussman M
    Caring; 1992 Feb; 11(2):38-9. PubMed ID: 10170916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ADA and alcohol use disorders among physicians.
    Regan J; Regan W; Burley HL; Outlaw F; Hamer G
    Tenn Med; 2006 Jun; 99(6):42-3. PubMed ID: 16802664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disability insurance--ADA--benefits for mental disability, alcoholism and drug abuse. Weyer v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 198 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir. 2000).
    Benefits Q; 2001; 17(3):64-6. PubMed ID: 11521552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.