These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14696602)

  • 1. The case of the British conjoined twins.
    Bleich JD
    Tradition; 2000; 34(4):61-78. PubMed ID: 14696602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conjoined twins: the limits of reason and the transcendent hope--part two.
    Phang A
    Law Justice; 2001; (147):89-113. PubMed ID: 12715812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conjoined twins: can the state mandate sacrifice surgery?
    Stewart LM
    Howard Law J; 2002; 45(3):675-96. PubMed ID: 15156890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conjoined twins : the limits of reason and the transcendent hope--part one.
    Phang A
    Law Justice; 2001; (146):38-56. PubMed ID: 12962087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 'On the sharpest horns of a dilemma': Re A (conjoined twins).
    Sheldon S; Wilkinson S
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 14696612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human beings, persons and conjoined twins: an ethical analysis of the judgement in Re A.
    Harris J
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):221-36. PubMed ID: 14696614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conjoined twins: separation as mutilation.
    Watt H
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 14696615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Maltese conjoined twins.
    Gormally L
    Second Opin (Chic); 2001 Oct; (8):36-52. PubMed ID: 16025644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation).
    Great Britain. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 2000; 4():961-1070. PubMed ID: 15069933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Killing Mary to save Jodie: conjoined twins and individual rights.
    Wasserman D
    Philos Public Policy Q; 2001; 21(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 12705248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The conjoined twins Mary and Jodie: ethical analysis of their case.
    Murphy-O'Connor C
    Origins; 2000 Oct; 30(17):269-72. PubMed ID: 12557888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The tragic case of Jodie and Mary: questions about separating conjoined twins.
    Kaczor C
    Linacre Q; 2003 May; 70(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 14696628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Murder by design: the 'feel-good factor' and the criminal law.
    McEwan J
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):246-58. PubMed ID: 14696616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Jodie and Mary.
    Bull Med Ethics; 2000 Sep; (161):17-24. PubMed ID: 14733207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Killing off Mary: was the Court of Appeal right?
    Hewson B
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):281-98. PubMed ID: 14696618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Was Mary's death murder?
    Uniacke S
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):208-20. PubMed ID: 14696613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Whose life is it anyway?
    Freeman M
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):259-80. PubMed ID: 14696617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conjoined twins: the ambiguity of double effect reasoning.
    Suziedelis AK
    Med Etika Bioet; 2001; 8(3-4):3-5. PubMed ID: 16285152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Jodie and Mary, conjoined twins: a case of judicial moral hubris?
    Gillon R
    Med Leg J; 2004; 72(Pt 1):3-16. PubMed ID: 15038316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resolving the unresolvable: the case of the conjoined twins.
    Bainham A
    Camb Law J; 2001; 60():49-53. PubMed ID: 15568258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.