These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14696612)

  • 1. 'On the sharpest horns of a dilemma': Re A (conjoined twins).
    Sheldon S; Wilkinson S
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 14696612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human beings, persons and conjoined twins: an ethical analysis of the judgement in Re A.
    Harris J
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):221-36. PubMed ID: 14696614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Jodie and Mary.
    Bull Med Ethics; 2000 Sep; (161):17-24. PubMed ID: 14733207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conjoined twins: separation as mutilation.
    Watt H
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 14696615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Maltese conjoined twins.
    Gormally L
    Second Opin (Chic); 2001 Oct; (8):36-52. PubMed ID: 16025644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation).
    Great Britain. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 2000; 4():961-1070. PubMed ID: 15069933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Murder by design: the 'feel-good factor' and the criminal law.
    McEwan J
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):246-58. PubMed ID: 14696616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Was Mary's death murder?
    Uniacke S
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):208-20. PubMed ID: 14696613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Killing off Mary: was the Court of Appeal right?
    Hewson B
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):281-98. PubMed ID: 14696618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Killing Mary to save Jodie: conjoined twins and individual rights.
    Wasserman D
    Philos Public Policy Q; 2001; 21(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 12705248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conjoined twins : the limits of reason and the transcendent hope--part one.
    Phang A
    Law Justice; 2001; (146):38-56. PubMed ID: 12962087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The conjoined twins of Malta: direct or indirect killing?
    Guevin B
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 12866526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Did the principle of double effect justify the separation?
    Therrien M
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(3):417-27. PubMed ID: 12866529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The case of the British conjoined twins.
    Bleich JD
    Tradition; 2000; 34(4):61-78. PubMed ID: 14696602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conjoined twins: the limits of reason and the transcendent hope--part two.
    Phang A
    Law Justice; 2001; (147):89-113. PubMed ID: 12715812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Separating conjoined twins: legal reverberations of Jodie and Mary's predicament.
    Sawday JN
    Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 2002 Jan; 24(1):65-86. PubMed ID: 12741403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Maltese twins case.
    Wechter D
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(4):485. PubMed ID: 12854560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conjoined twins: can the state mandate sacrifice surgery?
    Stewart LM
    Howard Law J; 2002; 45(3):675-96. PubMed ID: 15156890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The conjoined twins Mary and Jodie: ethical analysis of their case.
    Murphy-O'Connor C
    Origins; 2000 Oct; 30(17):269-72. PubMed ID: 12557888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Square pegs in round holes: the dilemma of conjoined twins and individual rights.
    Munro VE
    Soc Leg Stud; 2001 Dec; 10(4):459-82. PubMed ID: 12741382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.