367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14696659)
1. Randomized multicenter comparison of 2 IMZ and 4 TPS screw implants supporting bar-retained overdentures in 425 edentulous mandibles.
Mau J; Behneke A; Behneke N; Fritzemeier CU; Gomez-Roman G; d'Hoedt B; Spiekermann H; Strunz V; Yong M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):835-47. PubMed ID: 14696659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A 10-year follow-up study of IMZ and TPS implants in the edentulous mandible using bar-retained overdentures.
Spiekermann H; Jansen VK; Richter EJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(2):231-43. PubMed ID: 7744443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 18271381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial.
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Visser A; Vissink A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous mandible: a 15-year comparative follow-up study.
Ortorp A; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 18783415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and radiologic evaluation of 2-stage IMZ implants placed in a single-stage procedure: 2-year results of a prospective comparative study.
Heydenrijk K; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Stegenga B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):424-32. PubMed ID: 12814319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.
Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants.
Jemt T; Chai J; Harnett J; Heath MR; Hutton JE; Johns RB; McKenna S; McNamara DC; van Steenberghe D; Taylor R; Watson RM; Herrmann I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 8752550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Removable implant-prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: five-year results of different prosthetic anchorage concepts.
Weinländer M; Piehslinger E; Krennmair G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 20556260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures.
Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA
Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative clinical study of three different endosseous implants in edentulous mandibles.
Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Støvne S; Haanaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 9714956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years.
Aparicio C; Ouazzani W; Garcia R; Arevalo X; Muela R; Fortes V
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):114-22. PubMed ID: 16919019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients.
Friberg B; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 18254740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Immediate rehabilitation of the completely edentulous jaw with fixed prostheses supported by either upright or tilted implants: a multicenter clinical study.
Capelli M; Zuffetti F; Del Fabbro M; Testori T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 17929526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immediate loading of two implants with a mandibular implant-retained overdenture: a new treatment protocol.
Stoker GT; Wismeijer D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 19681940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Overdentures in the edentulous mandible supported by implants and retained by a Dolder bar: a 5-year prospective study.
Heschl A; Payer M; Clar V; Stopper M; Wegscheider W; Lorenzoni M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Aug; 15(4):589-99. PubMed ID: 21834860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
