368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14696662)
1. Evaluation of the ITI Morse taper implant/abutment design with an internal modification.
Ding TA; Woody RD; Higginbottom FL; Miller BH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 14696662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design.
Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Sahin S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 15248881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Removal torques of conical, tapered implant abutments: the effects of anodization and reduction of surface area.
Squier RS; Psoter WJ; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 11858571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Critical bending moment of implant-abutment screw joint interfaces: effect of torque levels and implant diameter.
Tan BF; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):648-58. PubMed ID: 15508980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of repeated torque/mechanical loading cycles on two different abutment types in implants with internal tapered connections: an in vitro study.
Ricciardi Coppedê A; de Mattos Mda G; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):624-32. PubMed ID: 19281502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
Martin WC; Woody RD; Miller BH; Miller AW
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11458261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs.
Khraisat A; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):604-10. PubMed ID: 12488853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
Cibirka RM; Nelson SK; Lang BR; Rueggeberg FA
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 11264934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Critical bending moment of four implant-abutment interface designs.
Lee FK; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):744-51. PubMed ID: 20657869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
Kim KS; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Kwon HB; Yang JH; Lee JB; Yim SH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):834-9. PubMed ID: 21198900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of internal hexagonal index on removal torque and tensile removal force of different Morse taper connection abutments.
de Oliveira Silva TS; Mendes Alencar SM; da Silva Valente V; de Moura CDVS
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):621-627. PubMed ID: 27881313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Load fatigue performance of four implant-abutment interface designs: effect of torque level and implant system.
Quek HC; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 18548921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Force transmission of one- and two-piece morse-taper oral implants: a nonlinear finite element analysis.
Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 15248884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Probabilistic analysis of preload in the abutment screw of a dental implant complex.
Guda T; Ross TA; Lang LA; Millwater HR
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):183-93. PubMed ID: 18762030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
