These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14696728)

  • 1. Developmental differences in behavioral and event-related brain responses associated with response preparation and inhibition in a go/nogo task.
    Jonkman LM; Lansbergen M; Stauder JE
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Sep; 40(5):752-61. PubMed ID: 14696728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.
    Jonkman LM
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):181-93. PubMed ID: 16729977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response inhibition and attention processing in 5- to 7-year-old children with and without symptoms of ADHD: An ERP study.
    Spronk M; Jonkman LM; Kemner C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 119(12):2738-52. PubMed ID: 18951061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Source localization of the Nogo-N2: a developmental study.
    Jonkman LM; Sniedt FL; Kemner C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 May; 118(5):1069-77. PubMed ID: 17368096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CNV resolution does not cause NoGo anteriorisation of the P3: a failure to replicate Simson et al.
    Smith JL; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):349-57. PubMed ID: 23669175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention and inhibition in children with ASD, ADHD and co-morbid ASD + ADHD: an event-related potential study.
    Tye C; Asherson P; Ashwood KL; Azadi B; Bolton P; McLoughlin G
    Psychol Med; 2014 Apr; 44(5):1101-16. PubMed ID: 23673307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task.
    Tian Y; Yao D
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 18524452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Atypical brain activation in children who stutter in a visual Go/Nogo task: An ERP study.
    Piispala J; Määttä S; Pääkkönen A; Bloigu R; Kallio M; Jansson-Verkasalo E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 128(1):194-203. PubMed ID: 27919012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetics of preparation and response control in ADHD: the role of DRD4 and DAT1.
    Albrecht B; Brandeis D; Uebel-von Sandersleben H; Valko L; Heinrich H; Xu X; Drechsler R; Heise A; Kuntsi J; Müller UC; Asherson P; Steinhausen HC; Rothenberger A; Banaschewski T
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2014 Aug; 55(8):914-23. PubMed ID: 24521003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An electrophysiological study of response conflict processing across the lifespan: assessing the roles of conflict monitoring, cue utilization, response anticipation, and response suppression.
    Hämmerer D; Li SC; Müller V; Lindenberger U
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3305-16. PubMed ID: 20638396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Apr; 166(2-3):223-37. PubMed ID: 19286266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emotional context modulates response inhibition: neural and behavioral data.
    Albert J; López-Martín S; Carretié L
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):914-21. PubMed ID: 19716425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Information processing differences and similarities in adults with dyslexia and adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder during a Continuous Performance Test: a study of cortical potentials.
    Dhar M; Been PH; Minderaa RB; Althaus M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):3045-56. PubMed ID: 20600194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3.
    Verleger R; Paehge T; Kolev V; Yordanova J; Jaśkowski P
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Oct; 73(3):298-313. PubMed ID: 16837117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conflict and inhibition in the cued-Go/NoGo task.
    Randall WM; Smith JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 122(12):2400-7. PubMed ID: 21715225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Event-related potentials for response inhibition in Parkinson's disease.
    Bokura H; Yamaguchi S; Kobayashi S
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):967-75. PubMed ID: 15716167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.