These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14696834)

  • 21. In-office cone beam computerized tomography: technology review and clinical examples.
    Tischler M
    Dent Today; 2008 Jun; 27(6):102, 104, 106. PubMed ID: 18605111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dental implant imaging: TeraRecon's Dental 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography System.
    Garg AK
    Dent Implantol Update; 2007 Jun; 18(6):41-5. PubMed ID: 17682685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Implant imaging. Status, controversies, and new developments.
    Reiskin AB
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Jan; 42(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 9421669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Three-dimensional computer tomography (CT) in the evaluation of placement for dental implants.
    Lee CY
    Hawaii Dent J; 1996; 27(3):26-9. PubMed ID: 11908285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images.
    Correa LR; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A; Schropp L; da Silveira HE; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cone beam CT--anatomic assessment and legal issues: the new standards of care.
    Curley A; Hatcher DC
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2009 Sep; 37(9):653-62. PubMed ID: 19810647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The use of a computerized tomography-based software program with a flapless surgical technique in implant dentistry: a case report.
    Terzioğlu H; Akkaya M; Ozan O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 19344037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Imaging technology in implant diagnosis.
    Angelopoulos C; Aghaloo T
    Dent Clin North Am; 2011 Jan; 55(1):141-58. PubMed ID: 21094723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The expanding influence of computed tomography and the application of computer-guided implantology.
    Mandelaris GA; Rosenfeld AL
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 20(5):297-305; quiz 306. PubMed ID: 18649832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer-assisted implant placement. Part I: relationship of radiographic gray density and implant stability.
    Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Avsever H; Özdemir T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Dec; 15(6):893-906. PubMed ID: 22251553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Restoratively driven implant dentistry utilizing advanced software and CBCT: realistic abutments and virtual teeth.
    Ganz SD
    Dent Today; 2008 Jul; 27(7):122, 124, 126-7. PubMed ID: 18686668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
    Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cone-beam CT (CB Throne) applied to dentomaxillofacial region.
    Yajima A; Otonari-Yamamoto M; Sano T; Hayakawa Y; Otonari T; Tanabe K; Wakoh M; Mizuta S; Yonezu H; Nakagawa K; Yajima Y
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2006 Aug; 47(3):133-41. PubMed ID: 17344621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The use of computerized tomography for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K; Cehreli MC
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 12498461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The combination of digital surface scanners and cone beam computed tomography technology for guided implant surgery using 3Shape implant studio software: a case history report.
    Lanis A; Álvarez Del Canto O
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 25822304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning.
    Okano T; Harata Y; Sugihara Y; Sakaino R; Tsuchida R; Iwai K; Seki K; Araki K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 19176649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cone beam computed tomography-assisted treatment planning concepts.
    Ganz SD
    Dent Clin North Am; 2011 Jul; 55(3):515-36, viii. PubMed ID: 21726687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology.
    van der Zel JM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Enhancing implant surgery planning via computerized image processing.
    Cucchiara R; Franchini F; Lamma A; Lamma E; Sansoni T; Sarti E
    Int J Comput Dent; 2001 Jan; 4(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 11441568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.