These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14696834)

  • 41. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging.
    Sukovic P
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2003; 6 Suppl 1():31-6; discussion 179-82. PubMed ID: 14606532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom).
    Lascala CA; Panella J; Marques MM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):291-4. PubMed ID: 15585804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison between multislice and cone-beam computerized tomography in the volumetric assessment of cleft palate.
    Albuquerque MA; Gaia BF; Cavalcanti MG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Aug; 112(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 21664153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guidance for placement of dental implants: case report.
    Wong NY; Huffer-Charchut H; Sarment DP
    Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 17563502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Implant imaging for the dentist.
    Mupparapu M; Singer SR
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2004 Jan; 70(1):32. PubMed ID: 14709253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cone beam CT--anatomic assessment and legal issues: the new standards of care.
    Curley A; Hatcher DC
    Todays FDA; 2010; 22(4):52-5, 57-9, 61-3. PubMed ID: 20860345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Techniques for the use of CT imaging for the fabrication of surgical guides.
    Ganz SD
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Mar; 14(1):75-97. PubMed ID: 16522511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Cone beam computed tomography and SimPlant materialize dental software versus direct measurement of the width and height of the posterior mandible: an anatomic study.
    Maloney K; Bastidas J; Freeman K; Olson TR; Kraut RA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1923-9. PubMed ID: 21496995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Three-dimensional computed tomography imaging in dentistry.
    Kawamata A; Ariji Y; Langlais RP
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):395-410. PubMed ID: 10740775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. CT scan as a radiologic data base for optimum implant orientation.
    Weinberg LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Apr; 69(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 8463967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A case for routine computed tomography imaging of the dental alveolus before implant placement.
    Kraut RA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jan; 59(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 11152191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer-aided implant placement. Part II: reliability of mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides.
    Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Pişkin B; Özdemir T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Dec; 15(6):907-17. PubMed ID: 22235792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A method of gauging dental radiographs during treatment planning for dental implants.
    Anil S; Al-Ghamdi HS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Sep; 8(6):82-8. PubMed ID: 17846675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Guided surgery for implant therapy.
    Orentlicher G; Abboud M
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2011 May; 23(2):239-56, v-vi. PubMed ID: 21492799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Cone beam CT for diagnosis and treatment planning in trauma cases.
    Palomo L; Palomo JM
    Dent Clin North Am; 2009 Oct; 53(4):717-27, vi-vii. PubMed ID: 19958908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. New developments in: three-dimensional planning for orthognathic surgery.
    Popat H; Richmond S; Drage NA
    J Orthod; 2010 Mar; 37(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 20439928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Utilizing digital imaging to enhance the team approach to implant treatment.
    Tischler M
    Dent Today; 2009 Apr; 28(4):86, 88, 90-1. PubMed ID: 19408588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparative study of three imaging modalities currently used in the assessment of patients for maxillofacial surgery.
    Bamjee Y; Noffke CE
    SADJ; 2013 Apr; 68(3):106-12. PubMed ID: 23951774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Three-dimensional imaging and guided surgery for dental implants.
    Ganz SD
    Dent Clin North Am; 2015 Apr; 59(2):265-90. PubMed ID: 25835793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Diagnostic potential of 3D-data-based reconstruction software: an analysis of the rare disease pattern of cherubism.
    Holst AI; Hirschfelder U; Holst S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 Mar; 46(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 19254051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.