These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14696837)

  • 1. Cone beam volume tomography: an imaging option for diagnosis of complex mandibular third molar anatomical relationships.
    Danforth RA; Peck J; Hall P
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2003 Nov; 31(11):847-52. PubMed ID: 14696837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of 3-dimensional reconstructions to evaluate the anatomic relationship of the mandibular canal and impacted mandibular third molars.
    Friedland B; Donoff B; Dodson TB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 66(8):1678-85. PubMed ID: 18634957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study.
    Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(8):834-9. PubMed ID: 21507612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating impacted molars: augmenting traditional imaging studies.
    Friedlander AH; Yueh R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1776-7. PubMed ID: 19615600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.
    Tantanapornkul W; Okouchi K; Fujiwara Y; Yamashiro M; Maruoka Y; Ohbayashi N; Kurabayashi T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Feb; 103(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 17234544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship of the inferior alveolar canal to impacted third molars as evaluated by cone beam computed tomography.
    Barayan M; Ahmad M
    Northwest Dent; 2013; 92(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 23516718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potential reformatting errors in cone-beam computed tomography for dentoalveolar surgery: a cautionary tale.
    Jones JL; Knox J; Key SJ
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 55(1):71-73. PubMed ID: 27241557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and inferior alveolar nerve with dental 3-dimensional computed tomography.
    Nakayama K; Nonoyama M; Takaki Y; Kagawa T; Yuasa K; Izumi K; Ozeki S; Ikebe T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 67(12):2587-91. PubMed ID: 19925976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coronectomy with the diagnostic use of CBCT to aid in the prevention of iatrogenic damage to the inferior alveolar nerve.
    Stiefel KR; Baumgarten L
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 22623462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation of darkening of impacted mandibular third molar root on digital panoramic images with cone beam computed tomography findings.
    Tantanapornkul W; Okochi K; Bhakdinaronk A; Ohbayashi N; Kurabayashi T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jan; 38(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 19114418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of orthopantomography and computed tomography image for assessing the relationship between impacted mandibular third molar and mandibular canal.
    Katakam SK; Shankar U; Thakur D; Reddy TP; Hari KR; Janga D
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):819-23. PubMed ID: 23404009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of computerized tomography in management of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Dodson TB
    N Y State Dent J; 2005 Nov; 71(6):32-5. PubMed ID: 16447543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preoperative computed tomography imaging in the management of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Susarla SM; Dodson TB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 65(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 17174769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conventional CT and cone beam CT for improved dental diagnostics and implant planning.
    Ganz SD
    Dent Implantol Update; 2005 Dec; 16(12):89-95. PubMed ID: 16422471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiographic proximity of the mandibular third molar to the inferior alveolar canal.
    Miloro M; DaBell J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):545-9. PubMed ID: 16243238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of spiral C.T. in endodontic diagnosis.
    Linn JL; Goss AN
    Aust Endod J; 2000 Apr; 26(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 11359294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preoperative imaging in a case of molar retention.
    Engelke WG; Diederichs CG; Deckwer II
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Aug; 26(4):278-9. PubMed ID: 9258719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Diagnostic possibilities of digital volume tomography].
    Lemkamp M; Filippi A; Berndt D; Lambrecht JT
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2006; 116(6):645-53. PubMed ID: 16875261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association between impacted third molars and position of the mandibular canal: a morphological analysis using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Quirino de Almeida Barros R; Bezerra de Melo N; de Macedo Bernardino Í; Arêa Leão Lopes Araújo Arruda MJ; Meira Bento P
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 56(10):952-955. PubMed ID: 30448357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the position of unerupted mandibular third molars with and without root dilacerations: a study on panoramic radiographs.
    Nadaes MR; Maues CP; DE Andrade CO; Salvio LA; Devito KL; Romano Sousa CM
    Minerva Stomatol; 2016 Jun; 65(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 26859425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.