149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14697004)
1. Statistical validation based on parametric receiver operating characteristic analysis of continuous classification data.
Zou KH; Warfield SK; Fielding JR; Tempany CM; William MW; Kaus MR; Jolesz FA; Kikinis R
Acad Radiol; 2003 Dec; 10(12):1359-68. PubMed ID: 14697004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian regression methodology for estimating a receiver operating characteristic curve with two radiologic applications: prostate biopsy and spiral CT of ureteral stones.
Omalley AJ; Zou KH; Fielding JR; Tempany CM
Acad Radiol; 2001 Aug; 8(8):713-25. PubMed ID: 11508750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Original smooth receiver operating characteristic curve estimation from continuous data: statistical methods for analyzing the predictive value of spiral CT of ureteral stones.
Zou KH; Tempany CM; Fielding JR; Silverman SG
Acad Radiol; 1998 Oct; 5(10):680-7. PubMed ID: 9787838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate cancer: 1HMRS-DCEMR at 3T versus [(18)F]choline PET/CT in the detection of local prostate cancer recurrence in men with biochemical progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).
Panebianco V; Sciarra A; Lisi D; Galati F; Buonocore V; Catalano C; Gentile V; Laghi A; Passariello R
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):700-8. PubMed ID: 21330082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index.
Zou KH; Warfield SK; Bharatha A; Tempany CM; Kaus MR; Haker SJ; Wells WM; Jolesz FA; Kikinis R
Acad Radiol; 2004 Feb; 11(2):178-89. PubMed ID: 14974593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three validation metrics for automated probabilistic image segmentation of brain tumours.
Zou KH; Wells WM; Kikinis R; Warfield SK
Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1259-82. PubMed ID: 15083482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pathologic validation of a model based on diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for tumor delineation in the prostate peripheral zone.
Groenendaal G; Borren A; Moman MR; Monninkhof E; van Diest PJ; Philippens ME; van Vulpen M; van der Heide UA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(3):e537-44. PubMed ID: 22197085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric vs multiparametric MRI in clinically significant prostate cancer: Comparison between readers with different experience.
Di Campli E; Delli Pizzi A; Seccia B; Cianci R; d'Annibale M; Colasante A; Cinalli S; Castellan P; Navarra R; Iantorno R; Gabrielli D; Buffone A; Caulo M; Basilico R
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():17-23. PubMed ID: 29571792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict positive surgical margins.
Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 15351582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the predictive accuracy and the clinical benefit of a nomogram aimed to predict survival in node-positive prostate cancer patients: External validation on a multi-institutional database.
Bianchi L; Schiavina R; Borghesi M; Bianchi FM; Briganti A; Carini M; Terrone C; Mottrie A; Gacci M; Gontero P; Imbimbo C; Marchioro G; Milanese G; Mirone V; Montorsi F; Morgia G; Novara G; Porreca A; Volpe A; Brunocilla E
Int J Urol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):574-581. PubMed ID: 29633372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of serum prostate specific membrane antigen, prostate specific antigen, and free prostate specific antigen levels in radical prostatectomy patients.
Douglas TH; Morgan TO; McLeod DG; Moul JW; Murphy GP; Barren R; Sesterhenn IA; Mostofi FK
Cancer; 1997 Jul; 80(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 9210715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Kattan MW; Wheeler TM; Scardino PT
J Clin Oncol; 1999 May; 17(5):1499-507. PubMed ID: 10334537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the detection of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Sciarra A; Panebianco V; Salciccia S; Osimani M; Lisi D; Ciccariello M; Passariello R; Di Silverio F; Gentile V
Eur Urol; 2008 Sep; 54(3):589-600. PubMed ID: 18226441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and gleason score for predicting prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1165-70. PubMed ID: 15596191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: comparison of 11C-choline PET/CT with pelvic multiparametric MR imaging with endorectal coil.
Kitajima K; Murphy RC; Nathan MA; Froemming AT; Hagen CE; Takahashi N; Kawashima A
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 24434294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian multivariate hierarchical transformation models for ROC analysis.
O'Malley AJ; Zou KH
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):459-79. PubMed ID: 16217836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrated 68Gallium Labelled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-11 Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging Enhances Discriminatory Power of Multi-Parametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Al-Bayati M; Grueneisen J; Lütje S; Sawicki LM; Suntharalingam S; Tschirdewahn S; Forsting M; Rübben H; Herrmann K; Umutlu L; Wetter A
Urol Int; 2018; 100(2):164-171. PubMed ID: 29393268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical utility of antioxidant gene expression levels in circulating cancer cell clusters for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4-10 ng/mL and disease prognostication after radical prostatectomy.
Giesing M; Suchy B; Driesel G; Molitor D
BJU Int; 2010 Apr; 105(7):1000-10. PubMed ID: 19818074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the most optimal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging sequence for determining pathological length of capsular contact.
Onay A; Vural M; Armutlu A; Ozel Yıldız S; Kiremit MC; Esen T; Bakır B
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Mar; 112():192-199. PubMed ID: 30777210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate specific antigen and Gleason score to predict prostate cancer stage.
Poulakis V; Witzsch U; De Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
J Urol; 2004 Oct; 172(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 15371829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
