These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14697718)

  • 1. Resistance in series model for micellar enhanced ultrafiltration of eosin dye.
    Purkait MK; DasGupta S; De S
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2004 Feb; 270(2):496-506. PubMed ID: 14697718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration of eosin dye using hexadecyl pyridinium chloride.
    Purkait MK; Dasgupta S; De S
    J Hazard Mater; 2006 Aug; 136(3):972-7. PubMed ID: 16494998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration of phenolic derivatives from their mixtures.
    Purkait MK; DasGupta S; De S
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2005 May; 285(1):395-402. PubMed ID: 15797438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simultaneous removal of Cd (II) and p-cresol from wastewater by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration using rhamnolipid: Flux decline, adsorption kinetics and isotherm studies.
    Verma SP; Sarkar B
    J Environ Manage; 2018 May; 213():217-235. PubMed ID: 29500995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Removal of Eriochrome Blue Black R from wastewater using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration.
    Zaghbani N; Hafiane A; Dhahbi M
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Sep; 168(2-3):1417-21. PubMed ID: 19376644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration for arsenic(V) removal: effect of main operating conditions and dynamic modelling.
    Beolchini F; Pagnanelli F; De Michelis I; Vegliò F
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Apr; 40(8):2746-52. PubMed ID: 16683618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of zinc in synthetic wastewater using spiral-wound membrane.
    Rahmanian B; Pakizeh M; Maskooki A
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Dec; 184(1-3):261-267. PubMed ID: 20832940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Arsenate removal from aqueous solutions using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration.
    Bahmani P; Maleki A; Rezaee R; Mahvi AH; Khamforoush M; Dehestani Athar S; Daraei H; Gharibi F; McKay G
    J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2019 Jun; 17(1):115-127. PubMed ID: 31297206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mixed micellar solubilization for procion blue MxR entrapment and optimization of necessary parameters for micellar enhanced ultrafiltration.
    Yusaf A; Usman M; Ibrahim M; Mansha A; Haq AU; Rehman HF; Ali M
    Chemosphere; 2023 Feb; 313():137320. PubMed ID: 36410522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of skim milk treated with high hydrostatic pressure on permeate flux and fouling during ultrafiltration.
    Leu M; Marciniak A; Chamberland J; Pouliot Y; Bazinet L; Doyen A
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Sep; 100(9):7071-7082. PubMed ID: 28647330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Produced water treatment by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration.
    Deriszadeh A; Husein MM; Harding TG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Mar; 44(5):1767-72. PubMed ID: 20121232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of polysulfone and ceramic membranes for the separation of phenol in micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration.
    Sabaté J; Pujolà M; Llorens J
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2002 Feb; 246(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 16290396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
    Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration Using a Plant-Derived Surfactant for Dye Separation in Wastewater Treatment.
    Aryanti N; Nafiunisa A; Kusworo TD; Wardhani DH
    Membranes (Basel); 2020 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 32887244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of saponin biosurfactant and its recovery in the MEUF process for removal of methyl violet from wastewater.
    Samal K; Das C; Mohanty K
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 203(Pt 1):8-16. PubMed ID: 28778007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of process performance and fouling mechanisms in micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of nickel-contaminated waters.
    Danis U; Aydiner C
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Mar; 162(2-3):577-87. PubMed ID: 18602749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of micelle properties on micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration for chromium recovery.
    Nguyen HT; Chang WS; Nguyen NC; Chen SS; Chang HM
    Water Sci Technol; 2015; 72(11):2045-51. PubMed ID: 26606099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sulfate removal using colloid-enhanced ultrafiltration: performance evaluation and adsorption studies.
    Lin W; Zhang B; Ye X; Hawboldt K
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(5):5609-5624. PubMed ID: 32970260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simultaneous removal of nitrate and phosphate using cross-flow micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF).
    Kim BK; Baek K; Yang JW
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):227-34. PubMed ID: 15537011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of mass retention of dissolved organic matter and membrane pore size on membrane fouling and flux decline.
    Lin CF; Yu-Chen Lin A; Sri Chandana P; Tsai CY
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(2):389-94. PubMed ID: 19013630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.