These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1469797)
21. Research publication in pediatric surgery: a cross-sectional study of papers presented at the Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons and the American Pediatric Surgery Association. Zamakhshary M; Abuznadah W; Zacny J; Giacomantonio M J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Jul; 41(7):1298-301. PubMed ID: 16818067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. Dickersin K AIDS Educ Prev; 1997 Feb; 9(1 Suppl):15-21. PubMed ID: 9083596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis. Ioannidis JP J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power. Borm GF; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):47.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18620841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes. Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for primary open-angle glaucoma: a meta-analysis. Bonovas S; Peponis V; Filioussi K Diabet Med; 2004 Jun; 21(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 15154948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Meta-analysis of studies of passive smoking and lung cancer: effects of study type and continent. Taylor R; Najafi F; Dobson A Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 36(5):1048-59. PubMed ID: 17690135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of formal statistical significance on the credibility of observational associations. Ioannidis JP Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 168(4):374-83; discussion 384-90. PubMed ID: 18611956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Meta-analyses of observational and genetic association studies of folate intakes or levels and breast cancer risk. Lewis SJ; Harbord RM; Harris R; Smith GD J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Nov; 98(22):1607-22. PubMed ID: 17105984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Health effects of passive smoking]. Merletti F; Richiardi L; Boffetta P Med Lav; 1998; 89(2):149-63. PubMed ID: 9673105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Selective reporting biases in cancer prognostic factor studies. Kyzas PA; Loizou KT; Ioannidis JP J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jul; 97(14):1043-55. PubMed ID: 16030302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Meta-analyses with binary outcomes: how many studies need to be omitted to detect a publication bias? Saveleva E; Selinski S J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(13-14):845-50. PubMed ID: 18569583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Changing conclusions on secondhand smoke in a sudden infant death syndrome review funded by the tobacco industry. Tong EK; England L; Glantz SA Pediatrics; 2005 Mar; 115(3):e356-66. PubMed ID: 15741361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity. Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J; Olkin I Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2113-26. PubMed ID: 12820277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The specter of publication bias: adjustment for publication bias in the evidence on cardiac death associated with passive smoking in nonsmoking women. Takagi H; Umemoto T Int J Cardiol; 2011 Jun; 149(3):388-9. PubMed ID: 21453980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Bladder cancer risk in sales workers: artefact or cause for concern? 't Mannetje A; Pearce N Am J Ind Med; 2006 Mar; 49(3):175-86. PubMed ID: 16421931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution]. Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B; Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias. Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The importance of quality of primary studies in producing unbiased systematic reviews. Khan KS; Daya S; Jadad A Arch Intern Med; 1996 Mar; 156(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 8629879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]