These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14698371)
21. Managed care at the crossroads: can managed care organizations survive government regulation? Brown VY; Hartung BR Ann Health Law; 1998; 7():25-72. PubMed ID: 10187381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Member grievances in Medicare+Choice programs: a review of Grijalva v. Shalala. Levin L Manag Care Interface; 1999 Sep; 12(9):78-81. PubMed ID: 10621106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pegram v. Herdrich: The Supreme Court confronts managed care. Jost TS Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():187-93. PubMed ID: 12669328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Health plan responses to managed care regulation. Hurley RE; Draper DA Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(4):30-42. PubMed ID: 12561392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Any willing provider laws for pharmacies. Cohen MA; Layman KM; Knapp JA Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Dec; ():9-16. PubMed ID: 10788162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Supreme Court decides important HMO case involving physician incentives. Devlin MM J Med Pract Manage; 2000; 16(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 14608781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Health insurance 101. Salaneck A Pa Nurse; 2006 Jun; 61(2):13. PubMed ID: 16871979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Recent significant federal and state court decisions and statutes that affect managed care provider contracting. Rich JP; Rinn CC; Morgan SD Manag Care Q; 2003; 11(2):39-47. PubMed ID: 12968444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Supreme Court upholds Illinois law requiring independent review of some HMO coverage decisions. Sfikas PM J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Aug; 133(8):1117-9. PubMed ID: 12198993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Independent review of HMO decisions: The Supreme Court hears oral argument in Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran. Drenning MG Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Feb; ():3-5. PubMed ID: 12436733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Law & psychiatry: Pegram v. Herdrich: the Supreme Court passes the buck on managed care. Appelbaum PS Psychiatr Serv; 2000 Oct; 51(10):1225-6, 1238. PubMed ID: 11013317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Supreme Court strikes down state regulation of health plan coverage decisions. Meadors GM J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(3):154-5. PubMed ID: 15672906 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Supreme Court refuses to "precipitate the upheaval" in Pegram v. Herdrich. Torrance AB Health Care Law Mon; 2000 Jul; ():16-8. PubMed ID: 11066640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Insurance: Massachusetts court denies ERISA preemption of "Any Willing Provider" Act. Ozols A J Law Med Ethics; 1998; 26(1):75-6. PubMed ID: 11067590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. U.S. Supreme Court wades into ERISA one more time. Roeder KH; Rees JS GHA Today; 2004 Aug; 48(7):3, 9. PubMed ID: 15500273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Finance issue brief: any willing provider. Stauffer M Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2000 Jun; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 11073424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]