These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14698371)

  • 41. To preempt or not to preempt: HMO liability pre and post Pegram v. Herdrich.
    Glassman AD
    J Law Health; 2003-2004; 18(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16521889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. U.S. Supreme Court validates HMO financial incentives and further undermines professionalism in the practice of medicine.
    Gale AH
    Mo Med; 2000 Oct; 97(10):475-6. PubMed ID: 11043028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Consumer-choice markets: lessons from FEHBP mental health coverage.
    Foote SM; Jones SB
    Health Aff (Millwood); 1999; 18(5):125-30. PubMed ID: 10495599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The Supreme Court lets HMOs off the hook.
    Rice B
    Med Econ; 2004 Jul; 81(14):14, 16. PubMed ID: 15357171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Lessons from AWP (any willing provider).
    D'Andrea G
    Healthplan; 1996; 37(5):60-2, 64-9. PubMed ID: 10161665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Supreme Court rejects preemption in ERISA benefits dispute. Rush Prudential, Inc. v. Moran.
    Morreim EH
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2002 Nov; 20(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12412312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Finance issue brief: any willing provider: year end report-2003.
    MacEachern L
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2003 Dec; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 14969262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. U.S. Supreme Court rules on physicians' role under ERISA group health plans.
    Meadors GM
    J Med Pract Manage; 2000; 16(3):146-7. PubMed ID: 11280204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. ERISA preemption of medical negligence claims against HMO's: perceived conflict between Pennsylvania Supreme Court and 3rd Circuit paves way for showdown in U.S. Supreme Court.
    Ryan SA
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 2001; 21(3):5-10. PubMed ID: 11507946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Pegram v. Herdrich. 530 U.S. 211 (2000).
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():159-60. PubMed ID: 12669324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Managed care 1995. Do any-willing-provider laws really help doctors?
    Pretzer M
    Med Econ; 1995 Mar; 72(5):108-9, 113-4, 117-8. PubMed ID: 10140810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Pegram v. Herdrich: HMOs aren't perfect, but ..
    Wahl JR
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 2001; 27(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 12778921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The impact of the recent Supreme Court rulings in Pegram and Rush Prudential on state regulation of managed care organizations.
    Trueman DL
    J Health Law; 2003; 36(1):107-32. PubMed ID: 12784923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Workers of the world, panic!
    Parloff R
    Fortune; 2004 Jul; 150(1):36, 38. PubMed ID: 15270460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Pegram v. Herdrich: a victory for HMOs or the beginning of the end for ERISA preemption?
    Borzi PC
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():161-9. PubMed ID: 12669325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Supreme Court limits HMO lawsuits.
    Fine A
    Manag Care Q; 2004; 12(3):13-4. PubMed ID: 15702562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The swinging pendulum: the Supreme Court reverses course on ERISA and managed care.
    Kesselheim AS; Brennan TA
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):451-63. PubMed ID: 15742588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Supreme Court to decide whether ERISA pre-empts negligence claims against HMOs.
    Sfikas PM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Jan; 135(1):110-2. PubMed ID: 14959884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Pegram v. Herdrich. A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision threatens patients and physicians.
    Geist RW
    Minn Med; 2002 Jul; 85(7):6, 58-9. PubMed ID: 12152532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Rumblings of dissent hit HMO movement.
    Waldholz M
    Health Care Week; 1978 May; 1(46):1, 13. PubMed ID: 10307613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.