These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14698371)

  • 61. ERISA pre-empts patient's negligence claim against HMO.
    Sfikas PM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Dec; 134(12):1651-3. PubMed ID: 14719763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. HMOs' restrictions on clinical practice.
    Wilf TJ
    Psychiatr Serv; 2005 Mar; 56(3):360; author reply 361. PubMed ID: 15746524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The "R" word.
    Bloche MG; Jungman ER
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2002; 18(3):633-9. PubMed ID: 12491659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Any willing provider laws: what do they mean to Maryland physicians?
    Baker SD; Jiranek AL
    Md Med J; 1995 Feb; 44(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 7898288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A perspective from within the white coat.
    Chow RD
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():171-5. PubMed ID: 12669326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. High court upholds independent physician reviews under state law.
    Drenning MG
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Jul; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12420399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Discount fallout. Hammered & nailed.
    Haugh R
    Hosp Health Netw; 1999 Mar; 73(3):18, 20. PubMed ID: 10191724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. High court to review arbitration ruling in RICO suit against HMOs.
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Nov; ():8-10. PubMed ID: 12498020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Should your ERISA remedy depend upon your geography?: an analysis of Rush Prudential HMO, INC. v. Moran.
    Schulz AM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2003; 19(2):553-71. PubMed ID: 14748257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Factors affecting patients' self-referral to specialists.
    Hsu J; Go AS; Selby J
    JAMA; 2001 Aug; 286(6):672-3. PubMed ID: 11495614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Pegram's significance for managed health care.
    Saccoccio L
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():195-201. PubMed ID: 12669329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. How much damage did Supreme Court ruling do to health care unionization?
    Levin-Epstein M
    Manag Care; 2001 Aug; 10(8):16, 18. PubMed ID: 11565377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Supreme Court clarifies the breadth of ERISA preemption.
    Hershey N
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2004 Oct; 21(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 15495741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Court, 5-4, upholds authority of states to protect patients.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2002 Jun; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 12159896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A conversation with ... Mitch McConnell, senior senator from Kentucky.
    McConnell M
    Hosp Outlook; 1999 Sep; 2(7):5. PubMed ID: 10623029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Aetna Health, Inc. v. Davila: Implications for public health policy.
    Rosenbaum S; Teitelbaum J
    Public Health Rep; 2004; 119(5):510-2. PubMed ID: 15313115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Dividing loyalties: caring for individuals and populations.
    Jecker NS
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():177-86. PubMed ID: 12669327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Supreme Court ruling encourages greater awareness among patients.
    Abruzzo MD
    Manag Care; 2000 Aug; 9(8):48-9. PubMed ID: 11186515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Final appeal. High court to rule over right to sue for failure to cover doc-ordered care.
    Benko LB
    Mod Healthc; 2003 Nov; 33(45):18. PubMed ID: 14666547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Mismanaged care: the challenges facing judicial interpretation of contemporary health policy.
    Schlesinger M
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():203-13. PubMed ID: 12669330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.