These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1469865)

  • 1. [Effective forms of surgical dressing materials produced by the Paul Hartman firm].
    Fedorov VD; Adamian AA; Sedlarik K; Dobysh SV
    Khirurgiia (Mosk); 1992; (7-8):26-8. PubMed ID: 1469865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings.
    Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; van Hattem J
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18279292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
    Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
    Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.
    Colwell JC; Foreman MD; Trotter JP
    Decubitus; 1993 Jul; 6(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 8297488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An alternative dressing material for the split-thickness skin graft donor site: oxidized regenerated cellulose.
    Uysal AC; Alagoz MS; Orbay H; Sensoz O
    Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Jul; 57(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 16799310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.
    Payne WG; Posnett J; Alvarez O; Brown-Etris M; Jameson G; Wolcott R; Dharma H; Hartwell S; Ochs D
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Feb; 55(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19246785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The true cost of gauze.
    Motta G
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2008 Mar; 54(3):10; discussion 10. PubMed ID: 18459233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [EFFICACY OF DIFFERENT FORMS OF LOCAL HEMOSTATIC MATERIALS BASED ON OXIDIZE CELLULOSE IN THE EXPERIMENT].
    Tarkova AR; Chernyavskiy AM; Grigor'ev IA; Morozov SV; Rodionov VI; Kravchenko NI
    Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 2015; 174(6):56-9. PubMed ID: 27066660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alginate dressing and polyurethane film versus paraffin gauze in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a randomized controlled pilot study.
    Kaiser D; Hafner J; Mayer D; French LE; Läuchli S
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Feb; 26(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 23337646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of the atraumatic properties f bandage material].
    Daurova TT; Dudnikova GN; Rozanova IB; Andreev SD; Stoicheva LA
    Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1981 Dec; 92(12):754-7. PubMed ID: 7326431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on hydrocolloid occlusive dressing versus conventional gauze dressing in the healing of chronic wounds.
    Singh A; Halder S; Menon GR; Chumber S; Misra MC; Sharma LK; Srivastava A
    Asian J Surg; 2004 Oct; 27(4):326-32. PubMed ID: 15564189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The incise drape--boon or hazard: an experimental study.
    Beck WC; Geffert JP; Hansen M
    Am Surg; 1981 Aug; 47(8):343-6. PubMed ID: 7271077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of pressure achieved by various materials used for pressure dressings.
    Smith SL; Belmont JM; Casparian JM
    Dermatol Surg; 1999 Dec; 25(12):931-4. PubMed ID: 10594624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost benefits of two dressings in the management of surgical wounds.
    Moore PJ; Foster L
    Br J Nurs; 2000 Sep 28-Oct 11; 9(17):1128-32. PubMed ID: 11868167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Economics of pressure-ulcer care: review of the literature on modern versus traditional dressings.
    San Miguel L; Torra i Bou JE; Verdú Soriano J
    J Wound Care; 2007 Jan; 16(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 17334139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of dressings on the costs of wound treatment.
    Hermans MH; Bolton LL
    Dermatol Nurs; 1996 Apr; 8(2):93-4, 97-100. PubMed ID: 8703613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gauze packing of open surgical wounds: empirical or evidence-based practice?
    Dinah F; Adhikari A
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2006 Jan; 88(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 16460637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. OUTCOME OF FOAM VERSUS GAUZE DRESSINGS IN NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE TRAUMATIC WOUNDS WITH SOFT TISSUE LOSS AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL.
    Ondieki JG; Khainga SO; Owilla F; Nangole FW
    East Afr Med J; 2012 Jul; 89(7):230-40. PubMed ID: 26845802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modelling the cost implications of using carboxymethylcellulose dressing compared with gauze in the management of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention in the US and UK.
    Guest JF; Ruiz FJ
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Feb; 21(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 15801999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effective managed care: gel versus wet-to-dry for debridement.
    Mulder GD
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Mar; 41(2):68-70, 72, 74 passim. PubMed ID: 7598779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.