These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14699926)

  • 1. A comparison of film-screen, CR and DR: a community hospital time-motion study.
    Mehta M; Lee T
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(6):38-42. PubMed ID: 14699926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
    Andriole KP
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Workflow assessment of digital versus computed radiography and screen-film in the outpatient environment.
    Andriole KP; Luth DM; Gould RG
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():124-6. PubMed ID: 12105711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Novel, portable, cassette-sized, and wireless flat-panel digital radiography system: initial workflow results versus computed radiography.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Ackermann H; Schomerus C; Jacobi V; Balzer JO; Vogl TJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1368-71. PubMed ID: 21606301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Workflow improvement and efficiency gain with near total digitalization of a radiology department].
    Langen HL; Bielmeier J; Wittenberg G; Selbach R; Feustel H
    Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1309-16. PubMed ID: 14556098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technologists' productivity when using PACS: comparison of film-based versus filmless radiography.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 12076899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and hard copy of computed radiography in full and two-thirds sizes in detection of interstitial lung disease.
    Kondoh H; Ikezoe J; Inamura K; Kuroda C; Kozuka T
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 Nov; 7(4):193-5. PubMed ID: 7858016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of PACS on the time required for technologists to produce radiographic images in the emergency department radiology suite.
    Redfern RO; Langlotz CP; Abbuhl SB; Polansky M; Horii SC; Kundel HL
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):153-60. PubMed ID: 12415466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new approach to RIS/DR interconnection.
    Hayes B
    Radiol Manage; 1999; 21(2):44-7. PubMed ID: 10351742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Challenges associated with the incorporation of digital radiography into a picture archival and communication system.
    Siegel EL; Reiner BI
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):6-8. PubMed ID: 10342154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multi-institutional analysis of computed and direct radiography: part I. Technologist productivity.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ; Siddiqui KM; Musk A; Walker L; Chacko A
    Radiology; 2005 Aug; 236(2):413-9. PubMed ID: 15972337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cost-effectiveness evaluation of a digital radiography system].
    Guillaume L; Joris T; Mandry D; Kammacher L; Claudon M
    J Radiol; 2007; 88(7-8 Pt 1):963-7. PubMed ID: 17878853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital mobile radiography.
    Sagel SS; Jost RG; Glazer HS; Molina PL; Anderson DJ; Solomon SL; Schwarberg J
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 2299701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Status and prospects of digital detector technology for CR and DR.
    Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):32-8. PubMed ID: 15933078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of dose and image quality for computed radiography and digital radiography.
    Aldrich JE; Duran E; Dunlop P; Mayo JR
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 16511674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems.
    Sanada S; Doi K; Xu XW; Yin FF; Giger ML; MacMahon H
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 1870484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of digital radiography on emergency department radiographic examinations.
    Lee B; Junewick J; Luttenton C
    Emerg Radiol; 2006 May; 12(4):158-9. PubMed ID: 16601999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chest image quality: film-screen vs. computed radiography.
    Freedman M
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Jul; 10(7):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10170769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.