These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14699926)

  • 21. [New computed radiography technologies in digital radiography].
    Fasbender R; Schaetzing R
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 12764585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Increased productivity of a digital imaging system: one hospital's experience.
    Sack D
    Radiol Manage; 2001; 23(6):14-8. PubMed ID: 11793559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of the threshold detail detectability of a screen-film combination and computed radiology under conditions relevant to high-kVp chest radiography.
    Launders JH; Cowen AR
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Aug; 40(8):1393-8. PubMed ID: 7480121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Experiences with computed radiography: can we afford the cost?
    Bragg DG; Murray KA; Tripp D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):935-41. PubMed ID: 9308439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Soft-copy computed radiography in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: cost-savings analysis.
    Don S; Albertina MJ; Ammann DL; Evens RG; Siegel MJ
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):501-5. PubMed ID: 7480702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of computerized digital and film-screen radiography: response to variation in imaging kVp.
    Broderick NJ; Long B; Dreesen RG; Cohen MD; Cory DA; Katz BP; Kalasinski LA
    Pediatr Radiol; 1992; 22(5):346-9. PubMed ID: 1408442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG
    Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computed radiography versus mobile direct radiography for bedside chest radiographs: impact of dose on image quality and reader agreement.
    De Boo DW; Weber M; Deurloo EE; Streekstra GJ; Freling NJ; Dongelmans DA; Schaefer-Prokop CM
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Sep; 66(9):826-32. PubMed ID: 21570679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Current status of digital projectional radiography of the chest.
    Aberle DR; Hansell D; Huang HK
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 2299698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Diagnostic value of digital projection radiography in comparison with conventional roentgen technique].
    Krug B; Zähringer M; Lackner K
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 9172665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
    Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
    Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
    Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Impact of a PACS/RIS-integrated speech recognition system on radiology reporting time and report availability].
    Trumm CG; Glaser C; Paasche V; Crispin A; Popp P; Küttner B; Francke M; Nissen-Meyer S; Reiser M
    Rofo; 2006 Apr; 178(4):400-9. PubMed ID: 16607588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of digital radiography on clinical workflow.
    May GA; Deer DD; Dackiewicz D
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):76-8. PubMed ID: 10847368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The amorphous selenium based flat-panel detector. Clinical experiences].
    Schmidt EL; Herbig W
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 12764586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Digital chest radiography: clinical aspects.
    Tylén U
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):15-9. PubMed ID: 7734532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Integrating digital systems: commitment and collaboration.
    Himes JA; Rosenfeld K
    Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 15259684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.