These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14700251)

  • 1. Meet The Simpsons: top-down effects in face learning.
    Bonner L; Burton AM; Jenkins R; McNeill A; Vicki B
    Perception; 2003; 32(10):1159-68. PubMed ID: 14700251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The bilateral field advantage in a sequential face-name matching task with famous and nonfamous faces.
    Collin CA; Byrne S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 20384415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning the moves: the effect of familiarity and facial motion on person recognition across large changes in viewing format.
    Roark DA; O'Toole AJ; Abdi H; Barrett SE
    Perception; 2006; 35(6):761-73. PubMed ID: 16836043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integration of faces and voices, but not faces and names, in person recognition.
    O'Mahony C; Newell FN
    Br J Psychol; 2012 Feb; 103(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 22229775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gift from statistical learning: Visual statistical learning enhances memory for sequence elements and impairs memory for items that disrupt regularities.
    Otsuka S; Saiki J
    Cognition; 2016 Feb; 147():113-26. PubMed ID: 26688065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sex differences in unfamiliar face identification: evidence from matching tasks.
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M; Havard C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 21459354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERP profiles for face and word recognition are based on their status in semantic memory not their stimulus category.
    Nie A; Griffin M; Keinath A; Walsh M; Dittmann A; Reder L
    Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 1557():66-73. PubMed ID: 24530268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of inversion and familiarity on face versus body cues to person recognition.
    Robbins RA; Coltheart M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1098-104. PubMed ID: 22642217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Of gnomes and leprechauns: the recruitment of recent and categorical contexts in social judgment.
    Pettibone JC; Wedell DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):361-89. PubMed ID: 17196919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociation of rapid response learning and facilitation in perceptual and conceptual networks of person recognition.
    Valt C; Klein C; Boehm SG
    Br J Psychol; 2015 Aug; 106(3):375-96. PubMed ID: 25291047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognizing face identity from natural and morphed smiles.
    Lander K; Chuang L; Wickham L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):801-8. PubMed ID: 16608747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 1/f(p) Characteristics of the Fourier power spectrum affects ERP correlates of face learning and recognition.
    Blickhan M; Kaufmann JM; Denzler J; Schweinberger SR; Redies C
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Dec; 88(2-3):204-14. PubMed ID: 21856372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implicit learning of geometric eigenfaces.
    Gao X; Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 2014 Jun; 99():12-8. PubMed ID: 23911769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Change detection in an attended face depends on the expectation of the observer.
    Austen EL; Enns JT
    J Vis; 2003; 3(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 12678626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How multiple repetitions influence the processing of self-, famous and unknown names and faces: an ERP study.
    Tacikowski P; Jednoróg K; Marchewka A; Nowicka A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb; 79(2):219-30. PubMed ID: 21035509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of face familiarity on age decision.
    Bruyer R; Mejias S; Doublet S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Feb; 124(2):159-76. PubMed ID: 16643811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in face memory and eye fixation patterns during face learning.
    Sekiguchi T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 21354541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of age of acquisition on speed and accuracy of naming famous faces.
    Moore V; Valentine T
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 Aug; 51(3):485-513. PubMed ID: 9745378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual learning in face processing: comparison facilitates face recognition.
    Dwyer DM; Vladeanu M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):2055-67. PubMed ID: 19235097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Categorical learning between 'male' and 'female' photographic human faces in jungle crows (Corvus macrorhynchos).
    Bogale BA; Aoyama M; Sugita S
    Behav Processes; 2011 Jan; 86(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 20971169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.