These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14700357)

  • 1. Learning new words II: Phonotactic probability in verb learning.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Dec; 46(6):1312-23. PubMed ID: 14700357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning new words: phonotactic probability in language development.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Dec; 44(6):1321-37. PubMed ID: 11776368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The emerging lexicon of children with phonological delays: phonotactic constraints and probability in acquisition.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 47(5):1194-212. PubMed ID: 15603471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.
    Storkel HL; Armbrüster J; Hogan TP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 49(6):1175-92. PubMed ID: 17197489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of phonotactic probability/neighbourhood density on lexical learning in late talkers.
    MacRoy-Higgins M; Schwartz RG; Shafer VL; Marton K
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(2):188-99. PubMed ID: 23472958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Adults' Word Learning in Noisy Conditions.
    Han MK; Storkel HL; Lee J; Cox C
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2016 Nov; 25(4):547-560. PubMed ID: 27788276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of homonym and novel word learning: the role of phonotactic probability and word frequency.
    Storkel HL; Maekawa J
    J Child Lang; 2005 Nov; 32(4):827-53. PubMed ID: 16429713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differentiating the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on vocabulary comprehension and production: a comparison of preschool children with versus without phonological delays.
    Storkel HL; Maekawa J; Hoover JR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 53(4):933-49. PubMed ID: 20543024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phonotactic probability effects in children who stutter.
    Anderson JD; Byrd CT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 51(4):851-66. PubMed ID: 18658056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonotactic probabilities in young children's speech production.
    Zamuner TS; Gerken L; Hammond M
    J Child Lang; 2004 Aug; 31(3):515-36. PubMed ID: 15612388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word learning by preschoolers with SLI: effect of phonotactic probability and object familiarity.
    Gray S; Brinkley S; Svetina D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 55(5):1289-300. PubMed ID: 22411280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonotactic probability and past tense use by children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers.
    Leonard LB; Davis J; Deevy P
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Oct; 21(10):747-58. PubMed ID: 17882693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of part-word phonotactic probability/neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children varying in expressive vocabulary.
    Storkel HL; Hoover JR
    J Child Lang; 2011 Jun; 38(3):628-43. PubMed ID: 20609282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of incremental changes in phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children.
    Storkel HL; Bontempo DE; Aschenbrenner AJ; Maekawa J; Lee SY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1689-700. PubMed ID: 23882005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Influence of Phonotactic Probability on Nonword Repetition and Fast Mapping in 3-Year-Olds With a History of Expressive Language Delay.
    MacRoy-Higgins M; Dalton KP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 58(6):1773-9. PubMed ID: 26540310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding Bilingual Word Learning: The Role of Phonotactic Probability and Phonological Neighborhood Density.
    Nair VK; Biedermann B; Nickels L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 60(12):3551-3560. PubMed ID: 29114764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gavagai is as Gavagai does: learning nouns and verbs from cross-situational statistics.
    Monaghan P; Mattock K; Davies RA; Smith AC
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Jul; 39(5):1099-112. PubMed ID: 25327892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation.
    Brent MR; Cartwright TA
    Cognition; 1996; 61(1-2):93-125. PubMed ID: 8990969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods for minimizing the confounding effects of word length in the analysis of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 47(6):1454-68. PubMed ID: 15842022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in the influence of phonological characteristics on expressive vocabulary development by young children.
    Maekawa J; Storkel HL
    J Child Lang; 2006 Aug; 33(3):439-59. PubMed ID: 17017275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.