99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14700361)
1. Contributions of semantic and facial information to perception of nonsibilant fricatives.
Jongman A; Wang Y; Kim BH
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Dec; 46(6):1367-77. PubMed ID: 14700361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Listener expectations and gender bias in nonsibilant fricative perception.
Babel M; McGuire G
Phonetica; 2013; 70(1-2):117-51. PubMed ID: 24157437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptual cues to the voiced-voiceless distinction of final fricatives for listeners with impaired or with normal hearing.
Revoile SG; Holden-Pitt L; Pickett JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Mar; 77(3):1263-5. PubMed ID: 3980876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-modal cross-linguistic perception of fricatives in clear speech.
Cho S; Jongman A; Wang Y; Sereno JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Apr; 147(4):2609. PubMed ID: 32359282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.
Jongman A; Wayland R; Wong S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1252-63. PubMed ID: 11008825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration.
Grant KW; Walden BE; Seitz PF
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2677-90. PubMed ID: 9604361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Congruent and incongruent semantic context influence vowel recognition.
Wotton JM; Elvebak RL; Moua LC; Heggem NM; Nelson CA; Kirk KM
Lang Speech; 2011 Sep; 54(Pt 3):341-60. PubMed ID: 22070043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual information constrains early and late stages of spoken-word recognition in sentence context.
Brunellière A; Sánchez-García C; Ikumi N; Soto-Faraco S
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):136-47. PubMed ID: 23797145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Linguistic experience and audio-visual perception of non-native fricatives.
Wang Y; Behne DM; Jiang H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1716-26. PubMed ID: 19045662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acoustically distinct and perceptually ambiguous: ʔayʔaǰuθəm (Salish) fricatives.
Mellesmoen G; Babel M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Apr; 147(4):2959. PubMed ID: 32359305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Context-independent dynamic information for the perception of coarticulated vowels.
Jenkins JJ; Strange W; Trent SA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jul; 106(1):438-48. PubMed ID: 10420634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acoustic analysis and perception of Spanish fricative consonants.
de Manrique AM; Massone MI
J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Apr; 69(4):1145-53. PubMed ID: 7229202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coding pitch differences in voiceless fricatives: Whispered relative to normal speech.
Heeren WF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3427-38. PubMed ID: 26723300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contributions of temporal encodings of voicing, voicelessness, fundamental frequency, and amplitude variation to audio-visual and auditory speech perception.
Faulkner A; Rosen S
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):2063-73. PubMed ID: 10530029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of voicing in fricatives and fricative clusters.
Stevens KN; Blumstein SE; Glicksman L; Burton M; Kurowski K
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2979-3000. PubMed ID: 1629490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Labeling of /s/ and [see text] by listeners with normal and impaired hearing, revisited.
Hedrick MS; Younger MS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Jun; 46(3):636-48. PubMed ID: 14696991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech perception of temporally reversed syllables by normally hearing adults.
Li AC; Boothroyd A
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1996 Jan; 57(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8820029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interactions between distal speech rate, linguistic knowledge, and speech environment.
Morrill T; Baese-Berk M; Heffner C; Dilley L
Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1451-7. PubMed ID: 25794478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
