These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14700361)

  • 21. Suprasegmental lexical stress cues in visual speech can guide spoken-word recognition.
    Jesse A; McQueen JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):793-808. PubMed ID: 24134065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perception of voiceless fricatives by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children and adults.
    Pittman AL; Stelmachowicz PG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Dec; 43(6):1389-401. PubMed ID: 11193960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Duration of frication noise required for identification of English fricatives.
    Jongman A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1718-25. PubMed ID: 2708688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perceptual integration of acoustic cues to laryngeal contrasts in Korean fricatives.
    Lee S; Katz J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):605-11. PubMed ID: 26936544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Absorption of reliable spectral characteristics in auditory perception.
    Kiefte M; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):366-76. PubMed ID: 18177166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of auditory-visual vowel identification training on speech recognition under difficult listening conditions.
    Richie C; Kewley-Port D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 51(6):1607-19. PubMed ID: 18695021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels spoken in sentence context.
    Strange W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 May; 85(5):2135-53. PubMed ID: 2732388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Delta, theta, beta, and gamma brain oscillations index levels of auditory sentence processing.
    Mai G; Minett JW; Wang WS
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jun; 133():516-528. PubMed ID: 26931813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of vowel duration as a cue for the voicing distinction in the following word-final consonant.
    Hogan JT; Rozsypal AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1764-71. PubMed ID: 7372932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences.
    Grant KW; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1197-208. PubMed ID: 11008820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What Are You Waiting For? Real-Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.
    Galle ME; Klein-Packard J; Schreiber K; McMurray B
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Jan; 43(1):. PubMed ID: 30648798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hearing faces: how the infant brain matches the face it sees with the speech it hears.
    Bristow D; Dehaene-Lambertz G; Mattout J; Soares C; Gliga T; Baillet S; Mangin JF
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 May; 21(5):905-21. PubMed ID: 18702595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Time course of early audiovisual interactions during speech and nonspeech central auditory processing: a magnetoencephalography study.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):259-74. PubMed ID: 18510440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Identification of words in whispered speech: The role of cues to fricatives' place and voicing.
    Jesus LMT; Ferreira JFS; Ferreira AJS
    JASA Express Lett; 2023 Aug; 3(8):. PubMed ID: 37555774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Foreign-accented speech modulates linguistic anticipatory processes.
    Romero-Rivas C; Martin CD; Costa A
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 May; 85():245-55. PubMed ID: 27020137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perception of voiceless fricatives by children with a functional articulation disorder.
    Rvachew S; Jamieson DG
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1989 May; 54(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 2709838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perception of speech sounds with alternate formants presented to opposite ears.
    Ainsworth WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 May; 63(5):1528-34. PubMed ID: 690332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Seeing facial motion affects auditory processing in noise.
    Gilbert JL; Lansing CR; Garnsey SM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Nov; 74(8):1761-81. PubMed ID: 23070884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Auditory discrimination of voiceless fricatives in children.
    Phatate DD; Umano H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Jun; 24(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 7265929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.