121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14701997)
1. The effects of pulse configuration on magnetic stimulation.
Al-Mutawaly N; de Bruin H; Hasey G
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2003; 20(5):361-70. PubMed ID: 14701997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of pulse configuration and direction of coil current on excitatory effects of magnetic motor cortex and nerve stimulation.
Niehaus L; Meyer BU; Weyh T
Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Jan; 111(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10656513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex.
Arai N; Okabe S; Furubayashi T; Terao Y; Yuasa K; Ugawa Y
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 116(3):605-13. PubMed ID: 15721074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An analysis of peripheral motor nerve stimulation in humans using the magnetic coil.
Maccabee PJ; Amassian VE; Cracco RQ; Cadwell JA
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988 Dec; 70(6):524-33. PubMed ID: 2461286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shortening of distal motor latency in anode distal stimulation.
Yasunami T; Miyawaki Y; Kitano K; Okuno H
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1355-61. PubMed ID: 15978497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of magnetic coil orientation on the excitation of the median nerve.
Sun SJ; Tobimatsu S; Kato M
Acta Neurol Scand; 1998 May; 97(5):328-35. PubMed ID: 9613564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surface recording of orthodromic sensory nerve action potentials in median and ulnar nerves in normal subjects.
Andersen K
Muscle Nerve; 1985 Jun; 8(5):402-8. PubMed ID: 16758586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measuring TMS stimulus/response characteristics from both hemispheres simultaneously for proximal and distal upper limb muscles.
Ray JL; McNamara B; Priest A; Boniface SJ
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Aug; 19(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 12436091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marked differences in the thermal characteristics of figure-of-eight shaped coils used for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Weyh T; Wendicke K; Mentschel C; Zantow H; Siebner HR
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1477-86. PubMed ID: 15978511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of coil current configuration in magnetic stimulation of a nerve fiber in inhomogeneous and anisotropic conducting media.
Hyodo A; Iramina K; Ueno S
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6501-4. PubMed ID: 19964443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Changes in magnetic coil orientation affect the stimulation effects of human peripheral nerve].
Sun SJ
Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi; 1996 Mar; 87(3):66-76. PubMed ID: 8727356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The boundary effect in magnetic stimulation. Analysis at the peripheral nerve.
Mathis J; Seemann U; Weyh T; Jakob C; Struppler A
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Oct; 97(5):238-45. PubMed ID: 7489685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Importance of soft tissue inhomogeneity in magnetic peripheral nerve stimulation.
Kobayashi M; Ueno S; Kurokawa T
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Oct; 105(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 9363007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraorbital optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes: in vivo electrophysiology study in rabbits.
Li L; Cao P; Sun M; Chai X; Wu K; Xu X; Li X; Ren Q
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 247(3):349-61. PubMed ID: 18989689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stimulus intensity and site of excitation in human median nerve sensory fibres.
Wiederholt WC
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1970 Aug; 33(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 5505670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monophasic and biphasic stimulation evoke different responses.
Field-Fote EC; Anderson B; Robertson VJ; Spielholz NI
Muscle Nerve; 2003 Aug; 28(2):239-41. PubMed ID: 12872331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal method to determine the stimulus intensity for median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials.
Fukuda H; Sonoo M; Kako M; Shimizu T
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 24(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 17938606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anodal block in F-wave studies.
Kirshblum S; Cai P; Johnston MV; Shah V; O'Connor K
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Sep; 79(9):1059-61. PubMed ID: 9749684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stimulus waveform influences the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Taylor JL; Loo CK
J Affect Disord; 2007 Jan; 97(1-3):271-6. PubMed ID: 16887197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties.
Shepherd RK; Javel E
Hear Res; 1999 Apr; 130(1-2):171-88. PubMed ID: 10320107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
