These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14703039)

  • 1. Consultant appraisal: pitfalls and how to avoid them.
    Waller DG
    Clin Med (Lond); 2003; 3(6):569-72. PubMed ID: 14703039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consultant appraisal: pitfalls and how to avoid them.
    Fletcher IR
    Clin Med (Lond); 2004; 4(2):191. PubMed ID: 15139745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The implications of enhancing appraisal to meet the requirements of revalidation, as perceived by appraisers: a qualitative study in Scotland.
    Wakeling J; Cameron N
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 22413658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consultant appraisal.
    Evans CC
    Clin Med (Lond); 2003; 3(6):495-6. PubMed ID: 14703023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality and impact of appraisal for revalidation: the perceptions of London's responsible officers and their appraisers.
    Griffin A; Furmedge DS; Gill D; O'Keeffe C; Verma A; Smith LJ; Noble L; Field R; Ingham Clark C
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 15():152. PubMed ID: 26392086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Portfolios, appraisal, revalidation, and all that: a user's guide for consultants.
    Davies H; Khera N; Stroobant J
    Arch Dis Child; 2005 Feb; 90(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 15665172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Paper trials: a qualitative study exploring the place of portfolios in making revalidation recommendations for Responsible Officers.
    Furmedge DS; Griffin A; O'Keeffe C; Verma A; Smith LJ; Gill D
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 16():66. PubMed ID: 26887892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring the experiences of general practice nurse peer appraisers.
    Ferguson J; Kennedy S
    Educ Prim Care; 2014 Sep; 25(5):268-75. PubMed ID: 25625834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strengthening medical appraisal: reactions to proposals for a new appraisal system to support revalidation.
    Ball K; Lyons N; Conlon M; Critchley R
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 22413662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The McDonaldization of appraisal? Doctors' views of the early impacts of medical revalidation in the United Kingdom.
    Archer J; Nunn S; Regan de Bere S
    Health Policy; 2017 Sep; 121(9):994-1000. PubMed ID: 28756852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. General practitioners, revalidation and appraisal: a cross sectional survey of attitudes, beliefs and concerns in Lincolnshire.
    Middlemass J; Siriwardena AN
    Med Educ; 2003 Sep; 37(9):778-85. PubMed ID: 12950940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How should we train consultant appraisers? Description and evaluation of a pilot training model developed in Scotland.
    Wakeling J; Staples I; Cameron N
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Jun; 18(3):547-54. PubMed ID: 21255201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revalidation - a personal reflection.
    Dawda P
    Aust Fam Physician; 2013 Nov; 42(11):826-8. PubMed ID: 24217109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The benefits of appraisal: a critical (re)view of the literature.
    Scallan S; Locke R; Eksteen D; Caesar S
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 26915657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using emotional intelligence to facilitate strengthened appraiser development.
    Tavabie A; Koczwara A; Patterson F
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 Jan; 21(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 20202316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. GP experiences of partner and external peer appraisal: a qualitative study.
    McKinstry B; Peacock H; Shaw J
    Br J Gen Pract; 2005 Jul; 55(516):539-43. PubMed ID: 16004740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audit of annual medical appraisal and revalidation activity across the UK Defence Medical Services 2013-2014.
    Morris LE; Withnall R
    J R Army Med Corps; 2017 Feb; 163(1):23-26. PubMed ID: 26759502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary codesign and testing of a feedback tool to improve the quality of peer appraiser documentation for medical revalidation.
    Murie J; MacWalter G; Bowie P
    Educ Prim Care; 2019 Jan; 30(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 30376417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards an understanding of how appraisal of doctors produces its effects: a realist review.
    Brennan N; Bryce M; Pearson M; Wong G; Cooper C; Archer J
    Med Educ; 2017 Oct; 51(10):1002-1013. PubMed ID: 28758237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-consultant career grade doctors in genitourinary medicine: as revalidation approaches, are some jobs at risk?
    Mullan H; Challenor R; Chandramani S; Theobald N; Rogstad K
    Int J STD AIDS; 2005 Sep; 16(9):596-9. PubMed ID: 16176624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.