These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14703546)

  • 1. Assessing the quality of research.
    Glasziou P; Vandenbroucke JP; Chalmers I
    BMJ; 2004 Jan; 328(7430):39-41. PubMed ID: 14703546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Education section - reporting of systematic reviews.
    J Evid Based Med; 2013 May; 6(2):122-3. PubMed ID: 23829809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new network to promote evidence-based research.
    Chalmers I; Nylenna M
    Lancet; 2014 Nov; 384(9958):1903-4. PubMed ID: 25435440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?].
    Antes G; von Elm E
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Aug; 134(33):1619. PubMed ID: 19650021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine: the salad is only as good as the ingredients.
    Amy JJ
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2013 Oct; 18(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 24044745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pragmatism, dynamism and flexibility in research and clinical practice.
    Acharya G
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Apr; 94(4):345-6. PubMed ID: 25761442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are meta-analyses clinically useful?
    Balon R
    Ann Clin Psychiatry; 2018 Feb; 30(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 29373612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement.
    Parekh-Bhurke S; Kwok CS; Pang C; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder JJ; Sutton AJ; Hing CB; Harvey I; Song F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 20800992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are we at the start of a new era in diagnostic research?
    Buntinx F; Knottnerus JA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 59(4):325-6. PubMed ID: 16549249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Touchstone Process: an ongoing critical evaluation of reiki in the scientific literature.
    Baldwin AL; Vitale A; Brownell E; Scicinski J; Kearns M; Rand W
    Holist Nurs Pract; 2010; 24(5):260-76. PubMed ID: 20706088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing research results in the medical literature: trust but verify.
    Califf RM; McCall J; Harrington RA
    JAMA Intern Med; 2013 Jun; 173(12):1053-5. PubMed ID: 23609490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Cochrane Collaboration turns 20: assessing the evidence to inform clinical care.
    Friedrich MJ
    JAMA; 2013 May; 309(18):1881-2. PubMed ID: 23652500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning from the past: refining the way we study treatments.
    Viechtbauer W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):980-2. PubMed ID: 20573485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Translating research into practice: criteria for applying literature search results to your work.
    Foster M; Shurtz S; Smith ML
    Health Promot Pract; 2014 Mar; 15(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 24344120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans?
    Pound P; Ebrahim S; Sandercock P; Bracken MB; Roberts I;
    BMJ; 2004 Feb; 328(7438):514-7. PubMed ID: 14988196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Save the baby: reviving deduction and refocusing induction in clinical research.
    Kwyer TA
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2007 Oct; 86(10):586-7. PubMed ID: 17990672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Searching the biomedical literature: research study designs and critical appraisal.
    Callas PW
    Clin Lab Sci; 2008; 21(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18335861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidenced based medicine. Benefits, limitations and issues for complementary and alternative medicine.
    Mendel J
    Aust J Holist Nurs; 2004 Oct; 11(2):21-9. PubMed ID: 19175254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Critical appraisal for emergency medicine: 1. Concepts and definitions.
    Goodacre S
    Emerg Med J; 2008 Apr; 25(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 18356354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence-based treatment of haemophilia.
    Bolton-Maggs PH; Stobart K; Smyth RL
    Haemophilia; 2004 Oct; 10 Suppl 4():20-4. PubMed ID: 15479367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.