BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14703723)

  • 1. Assessing immunotoxicity: guidelines.
    Putman E; van der Laan JW; van Loveren H
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2003 Oct; 17(5):615-26. PubMed ID: 14703723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regulatory aspects of immunotoxicology.
    Schulte A; Ruehl-Fehlert C
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2006 Jul; 57(5-6):385-9. PubMed ID: 16713214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of immunotoxic effects of nanomedicinal products with regulatory immunotoxicity testing requirements.
    Giannakou C; Park MV; de Jong WH; van Loveren H; Vandebriel RJ; Geertsma RE
    Int J Nanomedicine; 2016; 11():2935-52. PubMed ID: 27382281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. International Conference on Harmonisation; Guidance on S8 Immunotoxicity Studies for Human Pharmaceuticals; availability. Notice.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2006 Apr; 71(71):19193-4. PubMed ID: 16612859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. US FDA "Redbook II" immunotoxicity testing guidelines and research in immunotoxicity evaluations of food chemicals and new food proteins.
    Hinton DM
    Toxicol Pathol; 2000; 28(3):467-78. PubMed ID: 10862567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implications of the new FDA/CDER immunotoxicology guidance for drugs.
    Hastings KL;
    Int Immunopharmacol; 2002 Oct; 2(11):1613-8. PubMed ID: 12433062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ICH S8 immunotoxicity guidance. Immune function assessment and toxicological pathology: autonomous or synergistic methods to predict immunotoxicity?
    Spanhaak S
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2006 Jul; 57(5-6):373-6. PubMed ID: 16723215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two guidelines on immunotoxicity testing of medicinal products.
    Dujmović IH
    Arh Hig Rada Toksikol; 2005 Sep; 56(3):265-8. PubMed ID: 16180612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developmental immunotoxicity (DIT) in drug safety testing: matching DIT testing to adverse outcomes and childhood disease risk.
    Dietert RR
    Curr Drug Saf; 2008 Sep; 3(3):216-26. PubMed ID: 18691005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immune function testing of human pharmaceuticals: regulatory overshoot?
    van der Laan JW; van Loveren H
    Expert Opin Drug Saf; 2005 Jan; 4(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15709893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developmental immunotoxicity (DIT) testing of pharmaceuticals: current practices, state of the science, knowledge gaps, and recommendations.
    Collinge M; Burns-Naas LA; Chellman GJ; Kawabata TT; Komocsar WJ; Piccotti JR; Shenton J; Wierda D
    J Immunotoxicol; 2012; 9(2):210-30. PubMed ID: 22428536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immunotoxicology: role in the safety assessment of drugs.
    Descotes J
    Drug Saf; 2005; 28(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 15691223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A brief history of immunotoxicology and a review of the pharmaceutical guidelines.
    Dean JH
    Int J Toxicol; 2004; 23(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 15204726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to predict adverse immune reactions induced by pharmaceutical compounds.
    Goldman M; Miller K; Bazin H
    Trends Biotechnol; 1995 Aug; 13(8):283-5. PubMed ID: 7662302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Importance of immunotoxicity in safety assessment: a medical toxicologist's perspective.
    Descotes J
    Toxicol Lett; 2004 Apr; 149(1-3):103-8. PubMed ID: 15093254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Immunotoxicity assessment in the preclinical study of biologically active compounds].
    Uteshev BS; Arzamastsev EV
    Eksp Klin Farmakol; 1996; 59(3):3-8. PubMed ID: 8974580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toxicopathology of the developing immune system: investigative and development strategies.
    Weinstock D; Lewis DB; Parker GA; Beyer J; Collinge M; Brown TP; Dybdal N
    Toxicol Pathol; 2010 Dec; 38(7):1111-7. PubMed ID: 20962107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immunobiology of zinc and zinc therapy.
    Reinhold D; Ansorge S; Grüngreiff K
    Immunol Today; 1999 Feb; 20(2):102-3. PubMed ID: 10098330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Review on requirements of drug allergy or pseudoallergic reactions in pre-clinical evaluation].
    Han JY; Yi Y; Liang AH; Zhang YS; Li CY; Zhao Y; Wang LM; Lu YT; Li GQ
    Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi; 2015 Jul; 40(14):2685-9. PubMed ID: 26666009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Molecular and cellular basis of chemically induced immunotoxicity.
    Luster MI; Blank JA; Dean JH
    Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol; 1987; 27():23-49. PubMed ID: 3555316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.