These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14704579)

  • 1. Perception of symmetry in the face.
    Huisinga-Fischer CE; Souren JP; v d Werken F; Prahl-Andersen B; van Ginkel F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Jan; 15(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 14704579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The perception of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional simulated images.
    McAvinchey G; Maxim F; Nix B; Djordjevic J; Linklater R; Landini G
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):957-65. PubMed ID: 24673657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptions of chin asymmetries among dental professionals and laypersons.
    Jarosz KF; Bosio JA; Bloomstein R; Jiang SS; Vakharia NS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Aug; 154(2):201-212. PubMed ID: 30075922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Face symmetry assessment abilities: Clinical implications for diagnosing asymmetry.
    Jackson TH; Mitroff SR; Clark K; Proffit WR; Lee JY; Nguyen TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):663-71. PubMed ID: 24182582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can cephalometric indices and subjective evaluation be consistent for facial asymmetry?
    Masuoka N; Momoi Y; Ariji Y; Nawa H; Muramatsu A; Goto S; Ariji E
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 16097236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ptosis Sensitivity Threshold for the Lay Observer.
    Gordon MJ; Christenbury JG; Bokman CL; Rootman DB; Goldberg RA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Sep; 81(3):364-366. PubMed ID: 29905610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Threshold of visual perception of facial asymmetry in a facial paralysis model.
    Chu EA; Farrag TY; Ishii LE; Byrne PJ
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2011; 13(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 21242426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional perception of facial asymmetry.
    Meyer-Marcotty P; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A; Bareis U; Hartmann J; Kochel J
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):647-53. PubMed ID: 21355063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity of subjective evaluations for the assessment of lip scarring and impairment.
    Ritter K; Trotman CA; Phillips C
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 Nov; 39(6):587-96. PubMed ID: 12401105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objective assessment of facial asymmetry in rhinoplasty patients.
    Chatrath P; De Cordova J; Nouraei SA; Ahmed J; Saleh HA
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2007; 9(3):184-7. PubMed ID: 17515495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of occlusal plane inclination and mandibular deviation on esthetics.
    Corte CC; Silveira BL; Marquezan M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 20(5):50-7. PubMed ID: 26560821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of treatment need among orthodontic patients compared with professionals.
    Petersen B; Dahlström L
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1998 Oct; 56(5):299-302. PubMed ID: 9860099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons.
    Kumar S; Gandhi S; Valiathan A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):295. PubMed ID: 22945732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of Lip Cant as a Sign of Facial Deformity: Assessment by Laypersons and Professionals on Composite Face Photographs.
    Lee SF; Dumrongwongsiri S; Lo LJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jan; 82(1S Suppl 1):S140-S143. PubMed ID: 30516564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of the pink esthetic score--rating soft tissue esthetics around single-implant restorations with regard to dental observer specialization.
    Gehrke P; Lobert M; Dhom G
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(6):375-84; discussion 385. PubMed ID: 19120783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An appraisal of three methods of rating facial deformity in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Al-Omari I; Millett DT; Ayoub A; Bock M; Ray A; Dunaway D; Crampin L
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Sep; 40(5):530-7. PubMed ID: 12943433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lay person's perception of smile aesthetics in dental and facial views.
    Flores-Mir C; Silva E; Barriga MI; Lagravere MO; Major PW
    J Orthod; 2004 Sep; 31(3):204-9; discussion 201. PubMed ID: 15489364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of rhinoplasty on objective measurement and psychophysical appreciation of facial symmetry.
    Nouraei SA; Pulido MA; Saleh HA
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2009; 11(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 19451455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of the gingival display on posed smile with different facial forms: a comparison of dentists and patients concepts.
    Akhare PJ; Daga A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 23422598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.