284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14704725)
1. Terminal digit bias in a specialty hypertension faculty practice.
Thavarajah S; White WB; Mansoor GA
J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Dec; 17(12):819-22. PubMed ID: 14704725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of observer and patient factors on the occurrence of digit preference for zero in blood pressure measurement in a hypertension specialty clinic: evidence for the need of continued observation.
Graves JW; Bailey KR; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Meverden RA; Grill DE; Sheps SG
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Jun; 19(6):567-72. PubMed ID: 16733227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. End-digit preference and the quality of blood pressure monitoring in diabetic adults.
Kim ES; Samuels TA; Yeh HC; Abuid M; Marinopoulos SS; McCauley JM; Brancati FL
Diabetes Care; 2007 Aug; 30(8):1959-63. PubMed ID: 17485575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. End digit preference in blood pressure measurement in a hypertension specialty clinic in southwest Nigeria.
Ayodele OE; Sanya EO; Okunola OO; Akintunde AA
Cardiovasc J Afr; 2012 Mar; 23(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 22447477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Observer error in systolic blood pressure measurement in the elderly. A case for automatic recorders?
Hla KM; Vokaty KA; Feussner JR
Arch Intern Med; 1986 Dec; 146(12):2373-6. PubMed ID: 2877645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. End-digit preference in general practice: a comparison of the conventional auscultatory and electronic oscillometric methods.
Burnier M; Gasser UE
Blood Press; 2008; 17(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 18568699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Blood pressure determination by traditionally trained personnel is less reliable and tends to underestimate the severity of moderate to severe hypertension.
Roubsanthisuk W; Wongsurin U; Saravich S; Buranakitjaroen P
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 17353647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of automated blood pressure measurements in clinical trials and registration studies: data from the VALTOP Study.
Mengden T; Asmar R; Kandra A; Di Giovanni R; Brudi P; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2010 Aug; 15(4):188-94. PubMed ID: 20543666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigation of end-digit preference in blood pressure records of hospitalized chinese patients and analysis of risk factors.
Jie G; Jian W; Qiaowen H; Shanzhu Z
Postgrad Med; 2012 Mar; 124(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 22437215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the use of a semiautomated cuff-oscillometric sphygmomanometer in the hypertension clinic.
Prasad N; Wheeldon NM; MacDonald TM
Br J Clin Pract; 1994; 48(6):307-9. PubMed ID: 7848794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. End-digit preference in blood pressure recordings of patients with ischaemic heart disease in primary care.
de Lusignan S; Belsey J; Hague N; Dzregah B
J Hum Hypertens; 2004 Apr; 18(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 15037875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of terminal digit preference on blood pressure measurement and treatment in primary care.
Nietert PJ; Wessell AM; Feifer C; Ornstein SM
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Feb; 19(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 16448884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variation in recorded blood pressure terminal digit bias in general practice.
Harrison WN; Lancashire RJ; Marshall TP
J Hum Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 22(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 18046433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two automated sphygmomanometers for use in the office setting.
Myers MG; Valdivieso M; Kiss A; Tobe SW
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Feb; 14(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 19190490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Consistent relationship between automated office blood pressure recorded in different settings.
Myers MG; Valdivieso M; Kiss A
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Jun; 14(3):108-11. PubMed ID: 19417634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Quality assurance in Riva-Rocci blood pressure measurement: simultaneous sphygmomanometry with open and covered pressure display].
Hartmann B; Weise H; Bassenge E
Z Kardiol; 1988 Aug; 77(8):537-42. PubMed ID: 3176598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimum frequency of office blood pressure measurement using an automated sphygmomanometer.
Myers MG; Valdivieso M; Kiss A
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 19020423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digit Preference in Office Blood Pressure Measurements, United States 2015-2019.
Foti KE; Appel LJ; Matsushita K; Coresh J; Alexander GC; Selvin E
Am J Hypertens; 2021 May; 34(5):521-530. PubMed ID: 33246327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [How reliable is conventional blood pressure registration? Comparison with a semi-automatic device].
Kolb C; Huss R; Mengden T; Vetter W
Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1991 Mar; 80(12):286-90. PubMed ID: 2028135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Terminal digit bias is not an issue for properly trained healthcare personnel using manual or semi-automated devices - biomed 2010.
Butler KR; Minor DS; Benghuzzi HA; Tucci M
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2010; 46():75-80. PubMed ID: 20467075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
