208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14704726)
1. Clinical decision-making in hypertension using an automated (BpTRU) measurement device.
Graves JW; Nash C; Burger K; Bailey K; Sheps SG
J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Dec; 17(12):823-7. PubMed ID: 14704726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. BpTRU(tm) blood pressure monitor for use in a physician's office.
Allison C
Issues Emerg Health Technol; 2006 Aug; (86):1-4. PubMed ID: 16958188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Artsana CSI 610 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Pini C; Pastori M; Baccheschi J; Omboni S; Parati G;
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 17496468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation and effects of the Omron 725 CIC device for measuring blood pressure in a hypertension clinic.
Fonseca-Reyes S; Cervantes-Munguía R; de Alba-García JG; Parra-Carrillo JZ; López-Maldonado F; Montes-Casillas M
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):321-7. PubMed ID: 17890971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.
Graves JW; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Bailey KR; Feldstein J
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 16534405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the automated non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BpTRU) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in a paediatric population.
Mattu GS; Heran BS; Wright JM
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 15021077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.
Myers MG; McInnis NH; Fodor GJ; Leenen FH
Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated blood pressure measurement in routine clinical practice.
Myers MG
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 16534406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of blood pressure measurements between an automated oscillometric device and a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer in the northern Sweden MONICA study.
Eriksson M; Carlberg B; Jansson JH
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Aug; 17(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 22781634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the Microlife WatchBP Home device for self home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol.
Stergiou GS; Giovas PP; Gkinos CP; Patouras JD
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 17496469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Artsana CS 410 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Pini C; Natalizi A; Gerosa PF; Frigerio M; Omboni S; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Jun; 13(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 18496297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of the HoMedics BPA-300, a home blood pressure monitor using the auscultatory method.
Yarows SA
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):339-43. PubMed ID: 17890974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
