These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14704799)

  • 1. Depth-related visually evoked potentials by dynamic random-dot stereograms in humans: negative correlation between the peaks elicited by convergent and divergent disparities.
    Sahinoğlu B
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2004 May; 91(5-6):689-97. PubMed ID: 14704799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of disparity change on binocular visual evoked potential parameters elicited by convergent dynamic random-dot stereogram stimuli in humans.
    Sahinoğlu B
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 Nov; 88(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 12436288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The analysis of disparity evoked potentials by a new form of static random-dot stereograms.
    Hou C; Zhang X; Fang Q; Shou T; Zeng L; Yan M; Zhou Y; Hu B; Li P
    Yan Ke Xue Bao; 1995 Mar; 11(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 8575607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of depth perception using psychophysical thresholds and stereoscopically evoked brain activity.
    Skrandies W
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 119(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 19856007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stereomotion speed perception: contributions from both changing disparity and interocular velocity difference over a range of relative disparities.
    Brooks KR; Stone LS
    J Vis; 2004 Dec; 4(12):1061-79. PubMed ID: 15669911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Depth perception and evoked brain activity: the influence of horizontal disparity and visual field location.
    Skrandies W
    Vis Neurosci; 1997; 14(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 9194319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simple reaction times to cyclopean stimuli reveal that the binocular system is tuned to react faster to near than to far objects.
    Horváth G; Nemes VA; Radó J; Czigler A; Török B; Buzás P; Jandó G
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0188895. PubMed ID: 29304135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of interocular correlation and contrast on stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 18317331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The processing of stereoscopic information in human visual cortex: psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence.
    Skrandies W
    Clin Electroencephalogr; 2001 Jul; 32(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 11512379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Study on crossed and uncrossed disparity evoked potential of dynamic random dot stereogram].
    Liu H; Yan M; Zeng LF; Hou C; Liu LQ
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 42(10):878-82. PubMed ID: 17217778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural and vascular responses to fused binocular stimuli: a VEP and fNIRS study.
    Wijeakumar S; Shahani U; McCulloch DL; Simpson WA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 53(9):5881-9. PubMed ID: 22871839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence of basal temporo-occipital cortex involvement in stereoscopic vision in humans: a study with subdural electrode recordings.
    Gonzalez F; Relova JL; Prieto A; Peleteiro M
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Jan; 15(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 15217902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stereoscopic visual evoked potentials in normal subjects and patients with open-angle glaucomas.
    Bergua A; Horn FK; Martus P; Jünemann AM; Korth M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 242(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 14663591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Depth perception and amplitude of VEPs for variations of dot density in static random dot stereograms].
    Iizuka K
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Aug; 96(8):985-92. PubMed ID: 1519516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection duration thresholds and evoked potential measures of stereosensitivity.
    Manning ML; Finlay DC; Dewis SA; Dunlop DB
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1992; 79(2):161-75. PubMed ID: 1591970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) to Study Dynamic Stereoscopic Depth Perception.
    Ward LM; Morison G; Simpson WA; Simmers AJ; Shahani U
    Brain Topogr; 2016 Jul; 29(4):515-23. PubMed ID: 26900069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early and late VEPs for reading stimuli are altered by common binocular misalignments.
    Suter PS; Bass BL; Suter S
    Psychophysiology; 1993 Sep; 30(5):475-85. PubMed ID: 8416074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Correspondence of depth sensitivity and visually evoked potential amplitude in retinal eccentricity].
    Nakanishi F; Nikara T
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Nov; 100(11):877-84. PubMed ID: 8953891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disparity-tuning characteristics of neuronal responses to dynamic random-dot stereograms in macaque visual area V4.
    Tanabe S; Doi T; Umeda K; Fujita I
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Oct; 94(4):2683-99. PubMed ID: 16000525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stereopsis and binocularity in the squirrel monkey.
    Livingstone MS; Nori S; Freeman DC; Hubel DH
    Vision Res; 1995 Feb; 35(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 7892730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.