These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1470553)

  • 1. Laboratory evaluation of adhesive systems.
    Barkmeier WW; Cooley RL
    Oper Dent; 1992; Suppl 5():50-61. PubMed ID: 1470553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives.
    Rosa BT; Perdigão J
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 11203947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term effect of dentin primers on enamel bond strength and marginal adaptation.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 11203784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of dentin adhesives on the enamel-dentin/composite interfacial microleakage.
    Pradelle-Plasse N; Nechad S; Tavernier B; Colon P
    Am J Dent; 2001 Dec; 14(6):344-8. PubMed ID: 11949792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bonding ability of light cured composite resin to enamel and dentin promoted by various bonding systems--microleakage and bond strength studies.
    Torii Y; Iwami Y; Kato R; Imazato S; Torii M; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1990 Dec; 30():72-7. PubMed ID: 2151822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems.
    Ramos RP; Chinelatti MA; Chimello DT; Dibb RG
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bond strengths and SEM evaluation of Clearfil Liner Bond 2.
    Barkmeier WW; Los SA; Triolo PT
    Am J Dent; 1995 Dec; 8(6):289-93. PubMed ID: 8695004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resin bonding to primary teeth using three adhesive systems.
    Mazzeo N; Ott NW; Hondrum SO
    Pediatr Dent; 1995; 17(2):112-5. PubMed ID: 7603904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength.
    Zheng L; Pereira PN; Nakajima M; Sano H; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 11203783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of dentin primer on shear bond strength of composite resin to moist and dry enamel.
    Jain P; Stewart GP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 11203791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laboratory and FEA evaluation of dentin-to-composite bonding as a function adhesive layer thickness.
    Coelho PG; Calamia C; Harsono M; Thompson VP; Silva NR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18374973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of etching in bonding to enamel: a comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems.
    Erickson RL; Barkmeier WW; Latta MA
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1459-67. PubMed ID: 19665220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal microleakage of a sealant applied to permanent enamel: evaluation of 3 application protocols.
    Asselin ME; Fortin D; Sitbon Y; Rompré PH
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 18402096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of moist bonding on composite/enamel bond strength.
    Moll K; Gärtner T; Haller B
    Am J Dent; 2002 Apr; 15(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 12092997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.