These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14705996)

  • 21. Clinical audit in practice.
    Cooper J; Benjamin M
    Nurs Stand; 2004 Mar 24-30; 18(28):47-53; quiz 54-6. PubMed ID: 15069750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Methodological issues in grounded theory.
    Cutcliffe JR
    J Adv Nurs; 2000 Jun; 31(6):1476-84. PubMed ID: 10849161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The nursing contribution to qualitative research in palliative care 1990-1999: a critical evaluation.
    Bailey C; Froggatt K; Field D; Krishnasamy M
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 Oct; 40(1):48-60. PubMed ID: 12230529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The researcher's personal responses as a source of insight in the research process.
    Scott D
    Nurs Inq; 1997 Jun; 4(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 9224049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using a synthesised technique for grounded theory in nursing research.
    Chen HY; Boore JR
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Aug; 18(16):2251-60. PubMed ID: 19374696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differentiating between descriptive and interpretive phenomenological research approaches.
    Matua GA; Van Der Wal DM
    Nurse Res; 2015 Jul; 22(6):22-7. PubMed ID: 26168810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Methodological issues conducting sensitive research on lesbian and gay men's experience of nursing care.
    Platzer H; James T
    J Adv Nurs; 1997 Mar; 25(3):626-33. PubMed ID: 9080291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Field notes and theoretical memos in grounded theory.
    Montgomery P; Bailey PH
    West J Nurs Res; 2007 Feb; 29(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 17228061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups.
    Halcomb EJ; Gholizadeh L; DiGiacomo M; Phillips J; Davidson PM
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jun; 16(6):1000-11. PubMed ID: 17518876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Engaging men with penile cancer in qualitative research: reflections from an interview-based study.
    Witty K; Branney P; Bullen K; White A; Evans J; Eardley I
    Nurse Res; 2014 Jan; 21(3):13-9. PubMed ID: 24460560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Collecting and analysing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group.
    Sim J
    J Adv Nurs; 1998 Aug; 28(2):345-52. PubMed ID: 9725732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluating the findings of qualitative research.
    Byrne MM
    AORN J; 2001 Mar; 73(3):703-6. PubMed ID: 11253623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Reconstituting evaluation methods based on both qualitative and quantitative paradigms].
    Miyata H; Okubo S; Yoshie S; Kai I
    Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2011 Jan; 66(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 21358139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An emerging framework for human becoming criticism.
    Mitchell GJ
    Nurs Sci Q; 2004 Apr; 17(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 15090082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The authenticity and ethics of phenomenological research: how to overcome the researcher's own views.
    Häggman-Laitila A
    Nurs Ethics; 1999 Jan; 6(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 10067553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis.
    Moser A; Korstjens I
    Eur J Gen Pract; 2018 Dec; 24(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 29199486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reflexivity: promoting rigour in qualitative research.
    Jootun D; McGhee G; Marland GR
    Nurs Stand; 2009 Feb 11-17; 23(23):42-6. PubMed ID: 19263905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Are phenomenology and postpositivism strange bedfellows?
    Racher FE; Robinson S
    West J Nurs Res; 2003 Aug; 25(5):464-81; discussion 482-91. PubMed ID: 12955966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. From experience to definition: addressing the question 'what is qualitative research?'.
    Smythe L; Giddings LS
    Nurs Prax N Z; 2007 Jul; 23(1):37-57. PubMed ID: 18044234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.