These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1470631)

  • 1. Evaluation of the correlation box (Segner) for characterization of the facial skeleton.
    Järvinen SH
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1992; 88(1-2):39-48. PubMed ID: 1470631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What skeletal and dental characteristics do TMD patients have in common?
    Phillips JT
    Funct Orthod; 2007; 24(1):24-6, 28, 30. PubMed ID: 17402385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cephalometric evaluation of patients with anterior open-bite.
    Stuani AS; Matsumoto MA; Stuani MB
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 11210273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sagittal growth of the facial skeleton of 6-year-old children with a complete unilateral cleft of lip, alveolus and palate treated with two different protocols.
    Zemann W; Mossböck R; Kärcher H; Kozelj V
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007 Dec; 35(8):343-9. PubMed ID: 17954030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of cephalometric norms using a unified facial and dental approach.
    Anderson G; Fields HW; Beck M; Chacon G; Vig KW
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):612-8. PubMed ID: 16808567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving the concordance between various anteroposterior cephalometric measurements using Procrustes analysis.
    Wellens H
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):503-15. PubMed ID: 19687148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Facial prognathism and its relation to the cranial base in Brazilian children with Class I malocclusion].
    Mestriner Júnior W; Valente A
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1989; 3(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 2639454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application.
    Anwar N; Fida M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):516-22. PubMed ID: 19679646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.
    Celik E; Polat-Ozsoy O; Toygar Memikoglu TU
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 19237509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphological associations between the Angle classes.
    Dibbets JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 8670923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Saddle angle and maxillary prognathism: a radiological analysis of the association between the NSAr and SNA angles.
    Järvinen S
    Br J Orthod; 1984 Oct; 11(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 6594162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential diagnosis of skeletal open bite based on sagittal components of the face.
    Arat ZM; Işeri H; Arman A
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 15794041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does hyoid bone resection according to Sistrunk influence normal craniofacial growth? A cephalometric study.
    Joss-Vassalli IM; Joss CU; Gebauer U
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2275-82. PubMed ID: 19761923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Craniofacial profile in Southern Chinese with hypodontia.
    Chan DW; Samman N; McMillan AS
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19193707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence of muscle role over the cranio-facial skull development in Angle's Class III dental malocclusion under the clinical rest position.
    Gomes AC; Vitti M; Regalo SC; Semprini M; Siéssere S; Watanabe PC; Palomari ET
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2008; 48(8):335-41. PubMed ID: 19097473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method for defining targets in contemporary incisor inclination correction.
    Knösel M; Engelke W; Attin R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Sadat-Khonsari R; Gripp-Rudolph L
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 18678757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Craniofacial characteristics of patients with heart disease.
    Goldner MT; Martins e Martins M; Quintão CC; Mendes Ade M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):554-8. PubMed ID: 19815158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.