82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1470631)
1. Evaluation of the correlation box (Segner) for characterization of the facial skeleton.
Järvinen SH
Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1992; 88(1-2):39-48. PubMed ID: 1470631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What skeletal and dental characteristics do TMD patients have in common?
Phillips JT
Funct Orthod; 2007; 24(1):24-6, 28, 30. PubMed ID: 17402385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cephalometric evaluation of patients with anterior open-bite.
Stuani AS; Matsumoto MA; Stuani MB
Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 11210273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sagittal growth of the facial skeleton of 6-year-old children with a complete unilateral cleft of lip, alveolus and palate treated with two different protocols.
Zemann W; Mossböck R; Kärcher H; Kozelj V
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007 Dec; 35(8):343-9. PubMed ID: 17954030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of cephalometric norms using a unified facial and dental approach.
Anderson G; Fields HW; Beck M; Chacon G; Vig KW
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):612-8. PubMed ID: 16808567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving the concordance between various anteroposterior cephalometric measurements using Procrustes analysis.
Wellens H
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):503-15. PubMed ID: 19687148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Facial prognathism and its relation to the cranial base in Brazilian children with Class I malocclusion].
Mestriner Júnior W; Valente A
Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1989; 3(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 2639454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application.
Anwar N; Fida M
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):516-22. PubMed ID: 19679646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.
Celik E; Polat-Ozsoy O; Toygar Memikoglu TU
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 19237509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Morphological associations between the Angle classes.
Dibbets JM
Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 8670923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Saddle angle and maxillary prognathism: a radiological analysis of the association between the NSAr and SNA angles.
Järvinen S
Br J Orthod; 1984 Oct; 11(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 6594162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential diagnosis of skeletal open bite based on sagittal components of the face.
Arat ZM; Işeri H; Arman A
World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 15794041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does hyoid bone resection according to Sistrunk influence normal craniofacial growth? A cephalometric study.
Joss-Vassalli IM; Joss CU; Gebauer U
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2275-82. PubMed ID: 19761923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Craniofacial profile in Southern Chinese with hypodontia.
Chan DW; Samman N; McMillan AS
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19193707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence of muscle role over the cranio-facial skull development in Angle's Class III dental malocclusion under the clinical rest position.
Gomes AC; Vitti M; Regalo SC; Semprini M; Siéssere S; Watanabe PC; Palomari ET
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2008; 48(8):335-41. PubMed ID: 19097473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A method for defining targets in contemporary incisor inclination correction.
Knösel M; Engelke W; Attin R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Sadat-Khonsari R; Gripp-Rudolph L
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 18678757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Craniofacial characteristics of patients with heart disease.
Goldner MT; Martins e Martins M; Quintão CC; Mendes Ade M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):554-8. PubMed ID: 19815158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
