BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14707753)

  • 1. Comparing alternative Rasch-based methods vs raw scores in measuring change in health.
    Norquist JM; Fitzpatrick R; Dawson J; Jenkinson C
    Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I25-36. PubMed ID: 14707753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery.
    Fitzpatrick R; Norquist JM; Jenkinson C; Reeves BC; Morris RW; Murray DW; Gregg PJ
    Qual Life Res; 2004 Mar; 13(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 15085905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring disability in Medicare home care patients: application of Rasch modeling to the outcome and assessment information set.
    Fortinsky RH; Garcia RI; Joseph Sheehan T; Madigan EA; Tullai-McGuinness S
    Med Care; 2003 May; 41(5):601-15. PubMed ID: 12719685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties--a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score.
    Kalairajah Y; Azurza K; Hulme C; Molloy S; Drabu KJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Dec; 20(8):1037-41. PubMed ID: 16376260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.
    Rampersaud YR; Ravi B; Lewis SJ; Stas V; Barron R; Davey R; Mahomed N
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):296-304. PubMed ID: 17669690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Quality of life assessment one year after total hip or knee arthroplasty].
    Mainard D; Guillemin F; Cuny C; Mejat-Adler E; Galois L; Delagoutte J
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86(5):464-73. PubMed ID: 10970970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rasch scoring of outcomes of total hip replacement.
    Fitzpatrick R; Norquist JM; Dawson J; Jenkinson C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 56(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 12589872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery.
    Zanoli G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Jun; 76(318):5-47. PubMed ID: 16175972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the separation ratio and coefficient alpha in the creation of minimum item sets.
    Mallinson T; Stelmack J; Velozo C
    Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I17-24. PubMed ID: 14707752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity of self-assessment outcome questionnaires: patient-physician discrepancy in outcome interpretation.
    Ragab AA
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():579-84. PubMed ID: 12724955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Refractive Status and Vision Profile: evaluation of psychometric properties and comparison of Rasch and summated Likert-scaling.
    Garamendi E; Pesudovs K; Stevens MJ; Elliott DB
    Vision Res; 2006 Apr; 46(8-9):1375-83. PubMed ID: 16105674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Catquest-9SF patient outcomes questionnaire: nine-item short-form Rasch-scaled revision of the Catquest questionnaire.
    Lundström M; Pesudovs K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Mar; 35(3):504-13. PubMed ID: 19251145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain.
    Coster WJ; Haley SM; Andres PL; Ludlow LH; Bond TL; Ni PS
    Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I62-72. PubMed ID: 14707756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effects of rehabilitation after hip replacement surgery on postoperative complaints regarding the disease and limitation of function].
    Bitzer EM; Dörning H; Schwartz FW
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2001 Feb; 40(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 11253755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rasch modeling of revised token test performance: validity and sensitivity to change.
    Hula W; Doyle PJ; McNeil MR; Mikolic JM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 49(1):27-46. PubMed ID: 16533071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Refinement and reduction of the Impact of Psoriasis Questionnaire: classical test theory vs. Rasch analysis.
    Nijsten T; Unaeze J; Stern RS
    Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):692-700. PubMed ID: 16536813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why measurement matters for measuring patient vision outcomes.
    Mallinson T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):675-82. PubMed ID: 17700332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Activity outcome measurement for postacute care.
    Haley SM; Coster WJ; Andres PL; Ludlow LH; Ni P; Bond TL; Sinclair SJ; Jette AM
    Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I49-61. PubMed ID: 14707755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-reported functional outcome after primary total hip replacement treated with two different periopera-tive regimes: a follow-up study involving 61 patients.
    Petersen MK; Andersen NT; Søballe K
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Apr; 79(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 18473252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.