572 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14708042)
1. Bone mineral density referral for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using quantitative ultrasound as a prescreening tool in postmenopausal women from the general population: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Marín F; López-Bastida J; Díez-Pérez A; Sacristán JA;
Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Mar; 74(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 14708042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Primary prevention of osteoporosis: mass screening scenario or prescreening with questionnaires? An economic perspective.
Richy F; Ethgen O; Bruyere O; Mawet A; Reginster JY
J Bone Miner Res; 2004 Dec; 19(12):1955-60. PubMed ID: 15537437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with proximal femoral fractures--comparative study between quantitative ultrasonometry and gold standard DXA].
Schnabel M; Eser G; Ziller V; Mann D; Mann E; Hadji P
Zentralbl Chir; 2005 Oct; 130(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 16220445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calcaneus ultrasonometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of vertebral fracture risk.
Frediani B; Acciai C; Falsetti P; Baldi F; Filippou G; Siagkri C; Spreafico A; Galeazzi M; Marcolongo R
Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Oct; 79(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 16969597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost effectiveness analysis of BMD referral for DXA using ultrasound as a selective pre-screen in a group of women with low trauma Colles' fractures.
Sim MF; Stone M; Johansen A; Evans W
Technol Health Care; 2000; 8(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 11204173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of various screening methods for osteoporosis in perimenopausal Thai women.
Panichkul S; Panichkul P; Sritara C; Tamdee D
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2006; 62(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 16636570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost effectiveness analysis of using quantitative ultrasound as a selective pre-screen for bone densitometry.
Sim MF; Stone MD; Phillips CJ; Cheung WY; Johansen A; Vasishta S; Pettit RJ; Evans WD
Technol Health Care; 2005; 13(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 15912005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of accuracy and cost effectiveness of clinical criteria and BUA for referral for BMD assessment by DXA in osteoporotic and osteopenic perimenopausal subjects.
Langton CM; Langton DK; Beardsworth SA
Technol Health Care; 1999; 7(5):319-30. PubMed ID: 10543417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening for osteoporosis using easily obtainable biometrical data: diagnostic accuracy of measured, self-reported and recalled BMI, and related costs of bone mineral density measurements.
van der Voort DJ; Brandon S; Dinant GJ; van Wersch JW
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 10824239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Physical tests for patient selection for bone mineral density measurements in postmenopausal women.
Kärkkäinen M; Rikkonen T; Kröger H; Sirola J; Tuppurainen M; Salovaara K; Arokoski J; Jurvelin J; Honkanen R; Alhava E
Bone; 2009 Apr; 44(4):660-5. PubMed ID: 19138768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry.
Cadarette SM; Jaglal SB; Kreiger N; McIsaac WJ; Darlington GA; Tu JV
CMAJ; 2000 May; 162(9):1289-94. PubMed ID: 10813010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interest of a prescreening questionnaire to reduce the cost of bone densitometry.
Ben Sedrine W; Broers P; Devogelaer JP; Depresseux G; Kaufman JM; Goemaere S; Reginster JY
Osteoporos Int; 2002 May; 13(5):434-42. PubMed ID: 12086356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effectiveness of ultrasound and bone densitometry for osteoporosis screening in post-menopausal women.
Mueller D; Gandjour A
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2008; 6(2-3):113-35. PubMed ID: 19231905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis.
de Klerk G; van der Velde D; van der Palen J; van Bergeijk L; Hegeman JH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18825395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.
Nayak S; Roberts MS; Greenspan SL
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Dec; 155(11):751-61. PubMed ID: 22147714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a Swedish T-score reference population for women causes a two-fold increase in the amount of postmenopausal Swedish patients that fulfill the WHO criteria for osteoporosis.
Ribom EL; Ljunggren O; Mallmin H
J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 18280191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 10928222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and validation of a simple questionnaire to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density.
Lydick E; Cook K; Turpin J; Melton M; Stine R; Byrnes C
Am J Manag Care; 1998 Jan; 4(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 10179905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maximising the cost effectiveness of BMD referral for DXA using ultrasound as a selective population pre-screen.
Langton CM; Ballard PA; Langton DK; Purdie DW
Technol Health Care; 1997 Jul; 5(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 9263372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of using clinical risk factors with and without DXA for osteoporosis screening in postmenopausal women.
Mueller D; Gandjour A
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1106-17. PubMed ID: 19706151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
