These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14708540)

  • 1. Delivering the verdict.
    Nursing; 2003 Dec; 33(12):28. PubMed ID: 14708540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal strips "missing": did nurses monitor patient?
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 May; 40(12):2. PubMed ID: 11995057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Was there sufficient nurse expert testimony to go to a jury? Case on point: Nichols v. Good Samaritan Hospital, 2004 WL 2222384 -CA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Oct; 45(5):2. PubMed ID: 15559717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. $5 million jury verdict: fault apportioned 57% Dr. 43% RN.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 Dec; 41(7):1. PubMed ID: 11995071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. VA: Did pressure applied by RN cause palsy: judgment on verdict for $1.75 milion affirmed. Jones v. Williams, 091745 VAC (11/4/2010) S.E..2d VA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Nov; 51(6):3. PubMed ID: 21158265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Litigation, electronic fetal monitoring, and the obstetric nurse.
    McRae MJ
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1993; 22(5):410-9. PubMed ID: 8246093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Obstetrical liability update--Part I.
    Fiesta J
    Nurs Manage; 1995 Jul; 26(7):24. PubMed ID: 7603668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. RN removed FHR monitor to make room: $3.8 million verdict. CASE ON POINT: Long v. Wader, 2007 ALSC 1041887--08/31/07) So.2d-AL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2008 Jan; 48(8):2. PubMed ID: 18330376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should nurse have called 'on-call' obstetrician stat? Case on point: Garhart v. Columbia/HealthONE, L.L.C., 2004 WL 1433331 P.2d -CO.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Jul; 45(2):2. PubMed ID: 15382493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 'Simian creases' prove 'prenatal' injury: no liability. Case on point: Day v. Zuschke, (01/03/2008) P.3d -AZ.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2008 Jul; 49(2):2. PubMed ID: 18727319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nurses fail to timely respond: uterus ruptures--neurological injuries. Case on point: Howerton v. Mary Immaculate Hosp., 2002 WL 1269344 S.E.2d.-VA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jun; 43(1):2. PubMed ID: 12154444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Five doctors & four nurses sued after delivery. Case on point: Livingston v. Montgomery, 0302.730 (2/27/2009)-TX.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2009 Apr; 49(11):2. PubMed ID: 19499650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Was fundal pressure by nurses during birth cause of brain damage? Case on point: Martinez v. Northridge Hospital Medical Ctr., 2003 WL 22234957-CA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Oct; 44(5):2. PubMed ID: 14621515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. TX: forceps delivery--'ping-pong' depression: alleged failure to train & supervise nurses.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 May; 40(12):3. PubMed ID: 11995058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Failure to use fetal monitor & timely call physician. Case in point: Garcia v. Providence Medical Center (806 P. 2d 766--WA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 May; 31(12):4. PubMed ID: 1841401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nurses failed to respond to Ob/Gyn patient's pleas for help. Case on point: Nasser v. St. Vincent Hospital Health Svcs., 49A020919-CV-955, (4/14/2010)-IN.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 May; 50(12):4. PubMed ID: 20557021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FL: did nurse's ring cause delivery tear?: lack of evidence & expert testimony is fatal.
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1999 Feb; 39(9):3. PubMed ID: 10223026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Legal briefs for nurses. PA: expert testimony on care standard--OK: testimony on causation & diagnosis--NG; MO: failure to recognize complications: admissibility of nursing staff meeting minutes.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Dec; 36(7):3. PubMed ID: 8685373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal distress: "Failure to call for help". Case in point: Fairfax Hosp. System, Inc. v. McCarty (419 S.E.2d 621--VA [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Nov; 33(6):4. PubMed ID: 1302864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Defendants' judgment reversed: plaintiff's experts to testify. Grantham v. Crawford, COA09-528 NCCA (5/18/2010)-NC.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 May; 50(12):1. PubMed ID: 20557018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.