168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14709926)
1. Malpractice in oncology.
Hansis ML
Onkologie; 2003 Dec; 26(6):535-8. PubMed ID: 14709926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical pathways and guidelines reflected in malpractice judgment].
Ulsenheimer K
Urologe A; 2003 May; 42(5):705-7. PubMed ID: 12858866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Medical malpractice from the physician's viewpoint].
Carstensen G
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):570-5. PubMed ID: 8588425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Status and function of the anesthesiologic expert witness in the malpractice process].
Ulsenheimer K
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Feb; 30(1):55-60; discussion 60-5. PubMed ID: 7888524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Potential medical liability risk as the result of a second opinion in dermatopathology.
Elsner P; Schliemann S
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2018 Jan; 16(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 29232044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Liability risk of operations. Unavoidable complication or avoidable treatment error?].
Sailer R; Wienke A
Chirurg; 2014 Dec; 85(12):1098-102. PubMed ID: 25351345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Experiences with medical expert committees--procedures in physician malpractice claims].
Carstensen G
Versicherungsmedizin; 1989 Mar; 41(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 2705283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical malpractice: is the testimony expert?
Francis JD
Md Med; 2004; 5(1):7. PubMed ID: 15079939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Liability of the expert witness].
Jansen C
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):632-5. PubMed ID: 9064937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Medical malpractice in surgery I: Suspected malpractice and patterns of risks].
Hansis ML
Zentralbl Chir; 2003 Apr; 128(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 12700996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Medical standards in legal procedures].
Prien T
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Feb; 30(1):42-3; discussion 60-5. PubMed ID: 7888520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Expert testimony in malpractice suits].
Deutsch E
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 8588427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Whistle blowing in medicine: between the poles of informing and criminal liability].
Oehler T
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2014 Feb; 139(9):444-7. PubMed ID: 24558000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Regionalization in obstetrics from the forensic viewpoint].
Roemer VM
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7959309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Medical expert assessment in civil and criminal law--stand for evaluating medical expert assessment].
Kienzle HF
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):592-6. PubMed ID: 9064929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The standard of required medical responsibility as an instrument in malpractice cases].
Schreiber HL
Versicherungsmedizin; 1995 Feb; 47(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 7709504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Preventable treatment errors in gynecology and obstetrics. From the practice of an expert commission].
Cyran W
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):256-9. PubMed ID: 7959312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Significance of guidelines by specialty societies as clinical pathway in medicine. Malpractice liability of an indication (BGB section 823)].
Wienke A
HNO; 2003 Oct; 51(10):836-88. PubMed ID: 14971426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Legal malpractice problem of guidelines].
Ulsenheimer K
Versicherungsmedizin; 2001 Jun; 53(2):53-4. PubMed ID: 11411316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Ambulatory surgery from the forensic viewpoint].
Ulsenheimer K
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 7959314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
