These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14710868)

  • 41. Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.
    Lien MC; Proctor RW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):212-38. PubMed ID: 12120784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Backward inhibition as a means of sequential task-set control: evidence for reduction of task competition.
    Hübner M; Dreisbach G; Haider H; Kluwe RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Mar; 29(2):289-97. PubMed ID: 12696816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Development of mental attention in gifted and mainstream children: the role of mental capacity, inhibition, and speed of processing.
    Johnson J; Im-Bolter N; Pascual-Leone J
    Child Dev; 2003; 74(6):1594-614. PubMed ID: 14669884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Discrepancy processes in prospective memory retrieval.
    Breneiser JE; McDaniel MA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):837-41. PubMed ID: 17328382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 16724782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Eye movements, not hypercompatible mappings, are critical for eliminating the cost of task set reconfiguration.
    Hunt AR; Ishigami Y; Klein RM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):923-7. PubMed ID: 17328396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Hypnotizability and automaticity: toward a parallel distributed processing model of hypnotic responding.
    Dixon M; Brunet A; Laurence JR
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1990 Nov; 99(4):336-43. PubMed ID: 2266206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The development of selective inhibitory control: the influence of verbal labeling.
    Kray J; Kipp KH; Karbach J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 19084817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Allocation of attention and task difficulty.
    Merrill EC; Peacock M
    Am J Ment Retard; 1994 Mar; 98(5):588-93. PubMed ID: 8192904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Unconscious priming of task sets: the role of spatial attention.
    Zhou FA; Davis G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):105-14. PubMed ID: 21972047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck.
    Fagot C; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1058-79. PubMed ID: 1431744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A static color discontinuity can capture spatial attention when the target is an abrupt-onset singleton.
    Burnham BR; Neely JH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 18665729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Determinants of the benefit for consistent spatial mappings in dual-task performance of three-choice tasks.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1771-81. PubMed ID: 19933561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Contextual control over task-set retrieval.
    Crump MJ; Logan GD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2047-53. PubMed ID: 21097849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Does stimulus correspondence account for the Simon effect? Comments on Hasbroucq and Guiard (1991).
    O'Leary MJ; Barber PJ; Simon JR
    Psychol Res; 1994; 56(3):203-9; discussion 210-5. PubMed ID: 8008783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reading aloud and the question of intent.
    O'Malley S; Besner D
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Sep; 21(3):1298-310. PubMed ID: 22868215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Is semantic activation from print capacity limited? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Besner D; Reynolds M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):907-913. PubMed ID: 27812959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 8189193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effect of age of acquisition in visual word processing: further evidence for the semantic hypothesis.
    Ghyselinck M; Custers R; Brysbaert M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):550-4. PubMed ID: 14979824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Interactions between color and word processing in a flanker task.
    Henik A; Ro T; Merrill D; Rafal R; Safadi Z
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Feb; 25(1):198-209. PubMed ID: 10069032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.