BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14710956)

  • 1. Inhibition of return for the length of a line?
    Francis L; Milliken B
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1208-21. PubMed ID: 14710956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inhibition of return and attentional control settings.
    Gibson BS; Amelio J
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):496-504. PubMed ID: 10909240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orienting in space and time: joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects.
    Milliken B; Lupiáñez J; Roberts M; Stevanovski B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):877-83. PubMed ID: 15000534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inhibition of return and nonspecific preparation: separable inhibitory control mechanisms in space and time.
    Los SA
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Jan; 66(1):119-30. PubMed ID: 15095945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inhibition of return in manual and saccadic response systems.
    Briand KA; Larrison AL; Sereno AB
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Nov; 62(8):1512-24. PubMed ID: 11140175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus discrimination following covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue.
    Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 1826325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes.
    Kwak HW; Egeth H
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):455-64. PubMed ID: 1594435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.
    Folk CL; Remington RW; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1030-44. PubMed ID: 1431742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition.
    Pratt J; Hillis J; Gold JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Sep; 8(3):489-95. PubMed ID: 11700899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inhibition of return interacts with the Simon effect: an omnibus analysis and its implications.
    Ivanoff J; Klein RM; Lupiáñez J
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Feb; 64(2):318-27. PubMed ID: 12013383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues.
    Pratt J; Hirshhorn M
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 14634813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
    Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facilitation versus inhibition in non-spatial attribute discrimination tasks.
    Hu FK; Samuel AG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):784-96. PubMed ID: 21264703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Color-based inhibition of return.
    Law MB; Pratt J; Abrams RA
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Apr; 57(3):402-8. PubMed ID: 7770330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of multiple irrelevant visual events at the same spatial location on inhibition.
    Visser TA; Barnes D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 19304628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the costs and benefits of repeating a nonspatial feature in an exogenous spatial cuing paradigm.
    Klein RM; Wang Y; Dukewich KR; He S; Hu K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2293-304. PubMed ID: 26153659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inhibition of return for target discriminations: the effect of repeating discriminated and irrelevant stimulus dimensions.
    Taylor TL; Donnelly MP
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Feb; 64(2):292-317. PubMed ID: 12013382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does attention have different effects on line orientation and line arrangement discrimination?
    Cheal M; Lyon DR; Hubbard DC
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Nov; 43(4):825-57. PubMed ID: 1775666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of action on visual search: behavioral response toward stimuli modifies the selection process.
    Buttaccio DR; Hahn S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1453-66. PubMed ID: 21491163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stroop interference is affected in inhibition of return.
    Vivas AB; Fuentes LJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Jun; 8(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 11495120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.