These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14710963)

  • 1. High familiarity enhances visual change detection for face stimuli.
    Buttle H; Raymond JE
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1296-306. PubMed ID: 14710963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Face-specific configural processing of relational information.
    Leder H; Carbon CC
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):19-29. PubMed ID: 16464285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Configural face encoding and spatial frequency information.
    Boutet I; Collin C; Faubert J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1078-93. PubMed ID: 14674634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal integration in face perception: evidence of configural processing of temporally separated face parts.
    Anaki D; Boyd J; Moscovitch M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 17311475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Memory conjunction errors for realistic faces are consistent with configural processing.
    McKone E; Peh YX
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 16724776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ERP topography and human perceptual learning in the peripheral visual field.
    Shoji H; Skrandies W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 16356572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1518-32. PubMed ID: 15050576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Haven't we met before? The effect of facial familiarity on repetition priming.
    Stevenage SV; Spreadbury JH
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):79-94. PubMed ID: 16464288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in attentional involvement underlying the perception of distinctive and typical faces.
    Ryu JJ; Chaudhuri A
    Perception; 2007; 36(7):1057-65. PubMed ID: 17844971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces.
    Searcy JH; Bartlett JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Aug; 22(4):904-15. PubMed ID: 8756958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Face imagery is based on featural representations.
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 18271353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Line drawings of faces reduce configural processing.
    Leder H
    Perception; 1996; 25(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 8804099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants.
    Duchaine B; Nakayama K
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):576-85. PubMed ID: 16169565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Symmetrical interaction of sex and expression in face classification tasks.
    Aguado L; García-Gutierrez A; Serrano-Pedraza I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):9-25. PubMed ID: 19304593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in the coding of spatial relations in face identification and basic-level object recognition.
    Cooper EE; Wojan TJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Mar; 26(2):470-88. PubMed ID: 10764107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feature saliency in judging the sex and familiarity of faces.
    Roberts T; Bruce V
    Perception; 1988; 17(4):475-81. PubMed ID: 3244520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of emotional faces: salient physical features guide effective visual search.
    Calvo MG; Nummenmaa L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):471-94. PubMed ID: 18729711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of spatial frequency content on classification of face gender and expression.
    Aguado L; Serrano-Pedraza I; Rodríguez S; Román FJ
    Span J Psychol; 2010 Nov; 13(2):525-37. PubMed ID: 20977005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time course of visual attention with emotional faces.
    Srivastava P; Srinivasan N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):369-77. PubMed ID: 20139452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Practice makes it better: A psychophysical study of visual perceptual learning and its transfer effects on aging.
    Li X; Allen PA; Lien MC; Yamamoto N
    Psychol Aging; 2017 Feb; 32(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 27991807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.