153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1471161)
1. Differences of draining lymph node cell proliferation among mice, rats and guinea pigs following exposure to metal allergens.
Ikarashi Y; Ohno K; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Toxicology; 1992 Dec; 76(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 1471161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Draining lymph node cell activation in guinea pigs: comparisons with the murine local lymph node assay.
Maurer T; Kimber I
Toxicology; 1991; 69(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 1949049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of irritants on lymph node cell proliferation and the detection of contact sensitivity to metal salts in the murine local lymph node assay.
Ikarashi Y; Tsukamoto Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Sep; 29(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 8222623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of contact sensitivity of metal salts using the murine local lymph node assay.
Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Toxicol Lett; 1992 Aug; 62(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 1509507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lack of association between interleukin-6 production by contact allergen-activated draining lymph node cells and lymphoproliferative activity.
Lappin MB; Dearman RJ; Norval M; Kimber I
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9471985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytokine endpoints for the local lymph node assay: consideration of interferon-gamma and interleukin 12.
Dearman RJ; Hilton J; Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1999; 19(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 10362264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intralaboratory validation of alternative endpoints in the murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergic potential: primary ear skin irritation and ear-draining lymph node hyperplasia induced by topical chemicals.
Ulrich P; Streich J; Suter W
Arch Toxicol; 2001 Feb; 74(12):733-44. PubMed ID: 11305775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved ex vivo/in vitro lymph node cell proliferation assay in guinea pigs for a screening test of contact hypersensitivity of chemical compounds.
Kashima R; Oyake Y; Okada J; Ikeda Y
Toxicology; 1996 Nov; 114(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 8931760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of topical cis-urocanic acid on local lymph node activation during contact sensitization in mouse, rat and guinea-pig.
Lauerma AI; Homey B; Vohr HW; Lee CH; Bloom E; Maibach HI
Br J Dermatol; 1996 May; 134(5):904-9. PubMed ID: 8736333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the sensitization potential of five metal salts in the murine local lymph node assay.
Mandervelt C; Clottens FL; Demedts M; Nemery B
Toxicology; 1997 Jun; 120(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 9160110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The murine local lymph node assay: results of an inter-laboratory trial.
Kimber I; Hilton J; Botham PA; Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Miller K; Robbins MC; Harrison PT; Gray TJ; Waite SJ
Toxicol Lett; 1991 Feb; 55(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 1998208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of metal allergens on the DNA synthesis of unsensitized guinea pig lymphoid cells cultured in vitro.
Nordlind K
Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol; 1982; 69(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 6213563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contact sensitization of mice to nickel sulphate and potassium dichromate.
Kimber I; Bentley AN; Hilton J
Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Nov; 23(5):325-30. PubMed ID: 2096022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A nonradioisotopic endpoint for measurement of lymph node cell proliferation in a murine allergic contact dermatitis model, using bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry.
Lee JK; Park JH; Park SH; Kim HS; Oh HY
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2002; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12750042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The local lymph node assay: an interlaboratory evaluation of interleukin 6 (IL-6) production by draining lymph node cells.
Dearman RJ; Scholes EW; Ramdin LS; Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1994; 14(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 7963242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Examination of a vehicle for use with water soluble materials in the murine local lymph node assay.
Ryan CA; Cruse LW; Skinner RA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Gerberick GF
Food Chem Toxicol; 2002 Nov; 40(11):1719-25. PubMed ID: 12176099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contact and respiratory sensitizers can be identified by cytokine profiles following inhalation exposure.
De Jong WH; Arts JH; De Klerk A; Schijf MA; Ezendam J; Kuper CF; Van Loveren H
Toxicology; 2009 Jul; 261(3):103-11. PubMed ID: 19422874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The local lymph node assay and potential application to the identification of drug allergens.
Kimber I
Toxicology; 2001 Feb; 158(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 11164993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The local lymph node assay: developments and applications.
Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Scholes EW; Basketter DA
Toxicology; 1994 Sep; 93(1):13-31. PubMed ID: 7974502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
