BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1471161)

  • 21. The performance of the local lymph node assay with chemicals identified as contact allergens in the human maximization test.
    Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Kimber I
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Jun; 32(6):543-7. PubMed ID: 8045461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A sensitive mouse lymph node assay with two application phases for detection of contact allergens.
    Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
    Arch Toxicol; 1993; 67(9):629-36. PubMed ID: 8311690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry.
    Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA
    Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 10525437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of a B cell marker (B220) to discriminate between allergens and irritants in the local lymph node assay.
    Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA; Hulette BC; Chaney JG; Skinner RA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
    Toxicol Sci; 2002 Aug; 68(2):420-8. PubMed ID: 12151637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Anamnestic responses to contact allergens: application in the murine local lymph node assay.
    Kimber I; Weisenberger C
    J Appl Toxicol; 1991 Apr; 11(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 2061551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An international evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay and comparison of modified procedures.
    Kimber I; Hilton J; Dearman RJ; Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Ladics GS; Loveless SE; House RV
    Toxicology; 1995 Nov; 103(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 8525491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Allergic reaction induced by dermal and/or respiratory exposure to low-dose phenoxyacetic acid, organophosphorus, and carbamate pesticides.
    Fukuyama T; Tajima Y; Ueda H; Hayashi K; Shutoh Y; Harada T; Kosaka T
    Toxicology; 2009 Jul; 261(3):152-61. PubMed ID: 19467290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of cumulative allergen-activated lymph node cell proliferation using flow cytometry.
    Humphreys NE; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
    Toxicol Sci; 2003 May; 73(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 12700420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Allergenicity testing of supermethrin, phenoxyacetic acid and DNCB using in vivo and in vitro modifications of the local lymph node assays, maximization and epicutaneous testing.
    Kuricova M; Tulinska J; Kubova J; Liskova A; Fuortes L
    J Appl Toxicol; 2001; 21(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 11481656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Development and utilization of an ex vivo bromodeoxyuridine local lymph node assay protocol for assessing potential chemical sensitizers.
    Williams WC; Copeland C; Boykin E; Quell SJ; Lehmann DM
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Jan; 35(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 24532485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A preliminary evaluation of immune stimulation following exposure to metal particles and ions using the mouse popliteal lymph node assay.
    Tvermoes BE; Unice KM; Winans B; Kovochich M; Christian WV; Donovan E; Fung ES; Finley BL; Kimber I; Paustenbach DJ
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 308():77-90. PubMed ID: 27478144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of sensitive mouse lymph node assay for detection of contact sensitization capacity of dyes.
    Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
    J Appl Toxicol; 1996; 16(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 8854222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identification of metal allergens in the local lymph node assay.
    Basketter DA; Lea LJ; Cooper KJ; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 10594296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The murine local lymph node assay for identification of contact allergens: a preliminary evaluation of in situ measurement of lymphocyte proliferation.
    Kimber I; Hilton J; Weisenberger C
    Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Oct; 21(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 2598647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
    Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lymph node cell proliferation assay in guinea pigs for the assessment of sensitizing potentials of chemical compounds.
    Kashima R; Okada J; Ikeda Y
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):831-6. PubMed ID: 7927080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of auricular lymph node cell proliferation in isothiazolone-treated mice.
    Potter DW; Hazelton GA
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1995 Feb; 24(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 7737428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Determination of the sensitising activity of the rubber contact sensitisers TMTD, ZDMC, MBT and DEA in a modified local lymph node assay and the effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate pretreatment on local lymph node responses.
    De Jong WH; Tentij M; Spiekstra SW; Vandebriel RJ; Van Loveren H
    Toxicology; 2002 Jul; 176(1-2):123-34. PubMed ID: 12062936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Correlation between lymphocyte proliferative responses and dendritic cell migration in regional lymph nodes following skin painting with contact-sensitizing agents.
    Kimber I; Kinnaird A; Peters SW; Mitchell JA
    Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol; 1990; 93(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 2086486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The kinetics of cytokine production by draining lymph node cells following primary exposure of mice to chemical allergens.
    Hope JC; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Hopkins SJ
    Immunology; 1994 Oct; 83(2):250-5. PubMed ID: 7835943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.