164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1471170)
1. Classification of chemicals as sensitisers based on new test methods.
Botham PA
Toxicol Lett; 1992 Dec; 64-65 Spec No():165-71. PubMed ID: 1471170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals.
Kimber I; Basketter DA; Butler M; Gamer A; Garrigue JL; Gerberick GF; Newsome C; Steiling W; Vohr HW
Food Chem Toxicol; 2003 Dec; 41(12):1799-809. PubMed ID: 14563405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Behaviour of chemical respiratory allergens in novel predictive methods for skin sensitisation.
Basketter D; Poole A; Kimber I
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Jun; 86():101-106. PubMed ID: 28274809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The performance of the local lymph node assay with chemicals identified as contact allergens in the human maximization test.
Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Kimber I
Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Jun; 32(6):543-7. PubMed ID: 8045461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Activity of human contact allergens in the murine local lymph node assay.
Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Basketter DA; Lea L; Blaikie L; Dearman RJ; Warbrick EV; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Aug; 43(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 10945748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skin sensitisation testing--new perspectives and recommendations.
Steiling W; Basketter D; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Kimber I; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
Food Chem Toxicol; 2001 Apr; 39(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 11295477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chemical applicability domain of the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) for skin sensitisation potency. Part 2. The biological variability of the murine Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) for skin sensitisation.
Roberts DW; Api AM; Aptula AO
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 80():255-9. PubMed ID: 27470439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative evaluation of in vitro skin sensitisation tests: the human cell-line activation test (h-CLAT) versus the local lymph node assay (LLNA).
Ashikaga T; Sakaguchi H; Sono S; Kosaka N; Ishikawa M; Nukada Y; Miyazawa M; Ito Y; Nishiyama N; Itagaki H
Altern Lab Anim; 2010 Aug; 38(4):275-84. PubMed ID: 20822320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Specificity of the local lymph node assay (LLNA) for skin sensitisation.
Roberts DW; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2023 Jun; 141():105402. PubMed ID: 37116738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In chemico, in vitro and in vivo comparison of the skin sensitizing potential of eight unsaturated and one saturated lipid compounds.
Kreiling R; Gehrke H; Broschard TH; Dreeßen B; Eigler D; Hart D; Höpflinger V; Kleber M; Kupny J; Li Q; Ungeheuer P; Sauer UG
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Nov; 90():262-276. PubMed ID: 28958912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chemical applicability domain of the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) for skin sensitisation potency. Part 3. Apparent discrepancies between LLNA and GPMT sensitisation potential: False positives or differences in sensitivity?
Roberts DW; Schultz TW; Api AM
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 80():260-7. PubMed ID: 27477089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the predictive nature of the Genomic Allergen Rapid Detection (GARD) assay with mammalian assays in determining the skin sensitisation potential of agrochemical active ingredients.
Masinja W; Elliott C; Modi S; Enoch SJ; Cronin MTD; McInnes EF; Currie RA
Toxicol In Vitro; 2021 Feb; 70():105017. PubMed ID: 33038465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.
Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The local lymph node assay: current position in the regulatory classification of skin sensitizing chemicals.
Basketter DA; Gerberick GF; Kimber I
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 18058304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of the sensitivity of the 3-induction and 9-induction Buehler test procedures for assessing skin sensitisation potential.
Botham P; Urtizberea M; Wiemann C; Manciaux X; Tilbury L; Vohr HW; Allen S; Carmichael NG; de Jouffrey S
Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Jan; 43(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 15582197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fragrance sensitisers: Is inhalation an allergy risk?
Basketter D; Kimber I
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Dec; 73(3):897-902. PubMed ID: 26433121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consideration of criteria required for assignment of a (skin) sensitiser a substance of very high concern (SVHC) under the REACH regulation.
Basketter D; Kimber I
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Aug; 69(3):524-8. PubMed ID: 24893346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Skin sensitisation, vehicle effects and the local lymph node assay.
Basketter DA; Gerberick GF; Kimber I
Food Chem Toxicol; 2001 Jun; 39(6):621-7. PubMed ID: 11346493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are skin sensitisation test methods relevant for proteins?
Basketter DA; Kimber I
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Nov; 99():244-248. PubMed ID: 30268830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Propylene glycol, skin sensitisation and allergic contact dermatitis: A scientific and regulatory conundrum.
Pemberton MA; Kimber I
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2023 Feb; 138():105341. PubMed ID: 36702195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
