307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14711724)
1. What is lost by digitizing stereoscopic fundus color slides for macular grading in age-related maculopathy and degeneration?
Scholl HP; Dandekar SS; Peto T; Bunce C; Xing W; Jenkins S; Bird AC
Ophthalmology; 2004 Jan; 111(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 14711724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of age-related macular degeneration using a nonmydriatic digital camera and a standard film fundus camera.
Klein R; Meuer SM; Moss SE; Klein BE; Neider MW; Reinke J
Arch Ophthalmol; 2004 Nov; 122(11):1642-6. PubMed ID: 15534124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Grading of age-related maculopathy for epidemiological studies: is digital imaging as good as 35-mm film?
van Leeuwen R; Chakravarthy U; Vingerling JR; Brussee C; Hooghart AJ; Mulder PG; de Jong PT
Ophthalmology; 2003 Aug; 110(8):1540-4. PubMed ID: 12917169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter- and intra-observer variability in grading lesions of age-related maculopathy and macular degeneration.
Scholl HP; Peto T; Dandekar S; Bunce C; Xing W; Jenkins S; Bird AC
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2003 Jan; 241(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 12545291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The International Classification system and the progression of age-related macular degeneration.
Sallo FB; Peto T; Leung I; Xing W; Bunce C; Bird AC
Curr Eye Res; 2009 Mar; 34(3):238-40. PubMed ID: 19274532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the clinical age-related maculopathy staging system.
Seddon JM; Sharma S; Adelman RA
Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):260-6. PubMed ID: 16458093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-assisted, interactive fundus image processing for macular drusen quantitation.
Shin DS; Javornik NB; Berger JW
Ophthalmology; 1999 Jun; 106(6):1119-25. PubMed ID: 10366080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective evaluation of digital non-stereo color fundus photography as a screening tool in age-related macular degeneration.
Pirbhai A; Sheidow T; Hooper P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Mar; 139(3):455-61. PubMed ID: 15767053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of gradings of retinal photographs in eyes with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization and age-related macular degeneration in the macular photocoagulation study.
Jefferys JL; Alexander J; Hiner CJ; Javornik NB; Smith RE; Bressler NM; Hawkins BS
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2008; 15(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 18569815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of nonmydriatic digitized video fundus images with standard 35-mm slides to screen for and identify specific lesions of age-related macular degeneration.
Lim JI; Labree L; Nichols T; Cardenas I
Retina; 2002 Feb; 22(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 11884880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fifteen-year cumulative incidence of age-related macular degeneration: the Beaver Dam Eye Study.
Klein R; Klein BE; Knudtson MD; Meuer SM; Swift M; Gangnon RE
Ophthalmology; 2007 Feb; 114(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 17270675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image quality characteristics of a novel colour scanning digital ophthalmoscope (SDO) compared with fundus photography.
Strauss RW; Krieglstein TR; Priglinger SG; Reis W; Ulbig MW; Kampik A; Neubauer AS
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Nov; 27(6):611-8. PubMed ID: 17956367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of quantitative optical coherence tomography subanalysis in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Joeres S; Tsong JW; Updike PG; Collins AT; Dustin L; Walsh AC; Romano PW; Sadda SR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 48(9):4300-7. PubMed ID: 17724220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Grading of age-related maculopathy: slit-lamp biomicroscopy versus an accredited grading center.
Neelam K; Muldrew A; Hogg R; Stack J; Chakravarthy U; Beatty S
Retina; 2009 Feb; 29(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 18997640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk factors for choroidal neovascularization and geographic atrophy in the complications of age-related macular degeneration prevention trial.
Complications of Age-related Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial (CAPT) Research Group
Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1474-9, 1479.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18502512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Brightness, contrast, and color balance of digital versus film retinal images in the age-related eye disease study 2.
Hubbard LD; Danis RP; Neider MW; Thayer DW; Wabers HD; White JK; Pugliese AJ; Pugliese MF;
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Aug; 49(8):3269-82. PubMed ID: 18421079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can digitised colour 35 mm transparencies be used to diagnose diabetic retinopathy?
George LD; Leverton C; Young S; Lusty J; Dunstan FD; Owens DR
Diabet Med; 1997 Nov; 14(11):970-3. PubMed ID: 9400922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of autofluorescence imaging with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope and the fundus camera in age-related geographic atrophy.
Schmitz-Valckenberg S; Fleckenstein M; Göbel AP; Sehmi K; Fitzke FW; Holz FG; Tufail A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Aug; 146(2):183-92. PubMed ID: 18514607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
