173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14711954)
1. Comparison of proximal porous-coated and grit-blasted surfaces of hydroxyapatite-coated stems.
Won YY; Dorr LD; Wan Z
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 14711954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study.
Bolognesi MP; Pietrobon R; Clifford PE; Vail TP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Dec; 86(12):2720-5. PubMed ID: 15590859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of porous-coated titanium femoral stems with and without hydroxyapatite coating.
Kim YH; Kim JS; Oh SH; Kim JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Sep; 85(9):1682-8. PubMed ID: 12954825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of hydroxyapatite coating on the radio-clinical results of a grit-blasted titanium alloy femoral taper. A case-control study of 198 cementless primary total hip arthroplasty with the Alloclassic™ system.
Delaunay C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Nov; 100(7):739-44. PubMed ID: 25261173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized trial of hydroxyapatite coated prostheses in total hip arthroplasty.
Yee AJ; Kreder HK; Bookman I; Davey JR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Sep; (366):120-32. PubMed ID: 10627726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Grit-blasted and hydroxyapatite-coated total hip arthroplasty: an 11- to 14-year follow-up study.
Miyakawa S; Kawamura H; Mishima H; Yasumoto J
J Orthop Sci; 2004; 9(5):462-7. PubMed ID: 15449121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of surface roughness and polymethylmethacrylate precoating on the radiographic and clinical results of the Iowa hip prosthesis. A study of patients less than fifty years old.
Sporer SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Apr; 81(4):481-92. PubMed ID: 10225793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Long-term experience with the combined ARBOND hydroxyapatite coating in implant osteointegration].
Landor I; Vavrík P; Jahoda D; Pokorný D; Ballay R; Sosna A
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19595277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilateral total hip arthroplasty comparing hydroxyapatite coating to porous-coated fixation.
Dorr LD; Wan Z; Song M; Ranawat A
J Arthroplasty; 1998 Oct; 13(7):729-36. PubMed ID: 9802657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Different Materials and Proximal Coatings Used for Femoral Components in One-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Miyatake K; Jinno T; Koga D; Yamauchi Y; Muneta T; Okawa A
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Dec; 30(12):2237-41. PubMed ID: 26190568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biological fixation of hydroxyapatite-coated versus grit-blasted titanium hip stems: a canine study.
Eckardt A; Aberman HM; Cantwell HD; Heine J
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Feb; 123(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12582793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of diaphyseal biologic fixation on clinical results and fixation of the APR-II stem.
Kang JS; Dorr LD; Wan Z
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Sep; 15(6):730-5. PubMed ID: 11021448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a femoral stem with reduced stiffness. A randomized study with use of radiostereometry and bone densitometry.
Kärrholm J; Anderberg C; Snorrason F; Thanner J; Langeland N; Malchau H; Herberts P
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Sep; 84(9):1651-8. PubMed ID: 12208924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Arc-deposited hydroxyapatite-coated cups: results at four to seven years.
Capello WN; D'Antonio JA; Manley MT; Feinberg JR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Dec; 441():305-12. PubMed ID: 16331019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hydroxyapatite-coated proximal ingrowth femoral stems. A matched pair control study.
McPherson EJ; Dorr LD; Gruen TA; Saberi MT
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Jun; (315):223-30. PubMed ID: 7634671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is hydroxyapatite coating necessary to improve survivorship of porous-coated titanium femoral stem?
Kim YH; Kim JS; Joo JH; Park JW
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Apr; 27(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 21855271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Excellent results with femoral revision surgery using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stem: 59 patients followed for 10-16 years.
Reikerås O; Gunderson RB
Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 16541557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally porous-coated femoral stem.
Sinha RK; Dungy DS; Yeon HB
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jun; 86(6):1254-61. PubMed ID: 15173300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Femoral revision surgery using a fully hydroxyapatite-coated stem: a cohort study of twenty two to twenty seven years.
Reikerås O
Int Orthop; 2017 Feb; 41(2):271-275. PubMed ID: 27131803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of wear and osteolysis in hip replacement using two different coatings of the femoral stem.
Sanchez-Sotelo J; Lewallen DG; Harmsen WS; Harrington J; Cabanela ME
Int Orthop; 2004 Aug; 28(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 15118841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
