173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14711954)
21. Femoral remodeling after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty with and without hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate coating: a prospective randomized trial.
Tanzer M; Kantor S; Rosenthall L; Bobyn JD
J Arthroplasty; 2001 Aug; 16(5):552-8. PubMed ID: 11503113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison of bone remodelling around hydroxyapatite-coated, porous-coated and grit-blasted hip replacements retrieved at post-mortem.
Coathup MJ; Blunn GW; Flynn N; Williams C; Thomas NP
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2001 Jan; 83(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 11245519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Role of hydroxyapatite coating in resisting wear particle migration and osteolysis around acetabular components.
Coathup MJ; Blackburn J; Goodship AE; Cunningham JL; Smith T; Blunn GW
Biomaterials; 2005 Jul; 26(19):4161-9. PubMed ID: 15664643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Hydroxyapatite-coated titanium porous plasma spray tapered stem: experience at 15 to 18 years.
Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Mallory TH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():81-5. PubMed ID: 17312587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Tapered stems one-third proximally coated have higher complication rates than cylindrical two-third coated stems in patients with high hip dislocation undergoing total hip arthroplasty with step-cut shortening osteotomy.
Ozden VE; Dikmen G; Beksac B; Tozun IR
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Jun; 103(4):569-577. PubMed ID: 28300706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated and non-hydroxyapatite-coated noncemented total hip arthroplasty in same patients.
Lee JM; Lee CW
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):1019-23. PubMed ID: 17920475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Hydroxyapatite-coated stems in total hip arthroplasty after a minimum 10-years follow-up.
Gallo J; Landor I; Cechová I; Jahoda D
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Oct; 75(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 19026187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. High incidence of stem loosening in association with periprosthetic femur fractures in previously well-fixed cementless grit-blasted tapered-wedge stems.
Lim SJ; Lee KJ; Min BW; Song JH; So SY; Park YS
Int Orthop; 2015 Sep; 39(9):1689-93. PubMed ID: 25385003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Long-Term Comparison of Porous Versus Hydroxyapatite Coated Sleeve of a Modular Cementless Femoral Stem (SROM) in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Tudor FS; Donaldson JR; Rodriguez-Elizalde SR; Cameron HU
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1777-80. PubMed ID: 25971533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Excessive distal migration of fiber-mesh coated femoral stems.
Baad-Hansen T; Kold S; Olsen N; Christensen F; Søballe K
Acta Orthop; 2011 Jun; 82(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 21504304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A prospective randomized study comparing electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite and plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite on titanium stems.
Bøe BG; Röhrl SM; Heier T; Snorrason F; Nordsletten L
Acta Orthop; 2011 Feb; 82(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 21189109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of hydroxyapatite- and porous-coated stems in total hip replacement.
Park YS; Lee JY; Yun SH; Jung MW; Oh I
Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Jun; 74(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 12899544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Fully Hydroxyapatite-Coated Stem: A Cohort Study During 23-28 Years.
Reikerås O
J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1543-1546. PubMed ID: 28043711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The use of a hydroxyapatite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Kelly SJ; Incavo SJ; Beynnon B
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 16446187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study.
Clohisy JC; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 9973056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An assessment of the biological fixation of a retrieved Mayo femoral component.
Meldrum RD; Willie BM; Bloebaum RD
Iowa Orthop J; 2003; 23():103-7. PubMed ID: 14575260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Radiographic comparison of diaphyseal grit blasted with smooth surface stems by matched pair analysis.
Min B; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD; Wan Z
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2000 Dec; (381):156-67. PubMed ID: 11127652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Survivorship of femoral revision hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis.
Hungerford MW; Hungerford DS; Khanuja HS; Pietryak BP; Jones LC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Nov; 88 Suppl 3():126-30. PubMed ID: 17079378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Hydroxyapatite-coated total hip femoral components in patients less than fifty years old. Clinical and radiographic results after five to eight years of follow-up.
Capello WN; D'Antonio JA; Feinberg JR; Manley MT
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jul; 79(7):1023-9. PubMed ID: 9234878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Porous-coated versus grit-blasted surface texture of hydroxyapatite-coated implants during controlled micromotion: mechanical and histomorphometric results.
Overgaard S; Lind M; Glerup H; Bünger C; Søballe K
J Arthroplasty; 1998 Jun; 13(4):449-58. PubMed ID: 9645526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
