These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1471214)

  • 1. Prediction of non-genotoxic carcinogenesis.
    Ashby J
    Toxicol Lett; 1992 Dec; 64-65 Spec No():605-12. PubMed ID: 1471214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interaction and distinction of genotoxic and non-genotoxic events in carcinogenesis.
    Yamasaki H; Mesnil M; Nakazawa H
    Toxicol Lett; 1992 Dec; 64-65 Spec No():597-604. PubMed ID: 1471213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non-genotoxic factors in the carcinogenetic process: problems of detection and hazard evaluation.
    Parodi S; Malacarne D; Taningher M
    Toxicol Lett; 1992 Dec; 64-65 Spec No():621-30. PubMed ID: 1471216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-genotoxic carcinogenesis: implications for testing and extrapolation to man.
    Roe FJ
    Mutagenesis; 1989 Nov; 4(6):407-11. PubMed ID: 2695753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The relation between carcinogenesis and mutagenesis: a re-evaluation].
    Bartsch H; Malaveille C
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1989 Nov; 173(8):1005-12; discussion 1013-5. PubMed ID: 2633853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chemical structure, Salmonella mutagenicity and extent of carcinogenicity as indicators of genotoxic carcinogenesis among 222 chemicals tested in rodents by the U.S. NCI/NTP.
    Ashby J; Tennant RW
    Mutat Res; 1988 Jan; 204(1):17-115. PubMed ID: 3277047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Carcinogenicity categorization of chemicals-new aspects to be considered in a European perspective.
    Bolt HM; Foth H; Hengstler JG; Degen GH
    Toxicol Lett; 2004 Jun; 151(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 15177638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrated approach to testing and assessment for predicting rodent genotoxic carcinogenicity.
    Petkov PI; Schultz TW; Donner EM; Honma M; Morita T; Hamada S; Wakata A; Mishima M; Maniwa J; Todorov M; Kaloyanova E; Kotov S; Mekenyan OG
    J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1536-1550. PubMed ID: 27225589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
    Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of gastrointestinal drugs.
    Brambilla G; Mattioli F; Martelli A
    Mutagenesis; 2010 Jul; 25(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 20478972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of chemical structure on the extent and sites of carcinogenesis for 522 rodent carcinogens and 55 different human carcinogen exposures.
    Ashby J; Paton D
    Mutat Res; 1993 Mar; 286(1):3-74. PubMed ID: 7678908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanisms of non-genotoxic carcinogens and importance of a weight of evidence approach.
    Hernández LG; van Steeg H; Luijten M; van Benthem J
    Mutat Res; 2009; 682(2-3):94-109. PubMed ID: 19631282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Absence of morphologic correlation between chemical toxicity and chemical carcinogenesis.
    Huff J
    Environ Health Perspect; 1993 Dec; 101 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):45-53. PubMed ID: 8013424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies of analgesics, anti-inflammatory drugs and antipyretics.
    Brambilla G; Martelli A
    Pharmacol Res; 2009 Jul; 60(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 19427580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of short-term tests in determining the genotoxicity or nongenotoxicity of chemicals.
    Ashby J
    IARC Sci Publ; 1992; (116):135-64. PubMed ID: 1428079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Threshold effects in genetic toxicity: perspective of chemicals regulation in Germany.
    Madle S; von der Hude W; Broschinski L; Jänig G
    Mutat Res; 2000 Jan; 464(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 10633183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The prospects for a simplified and internationally harmonized approach to the detection of possible human carcinogens and mutagens.
    Ashby J
    Mutagenesis; 1986 Jan; 1(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 3325732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity test results be used to complement positive results in the Ames test and help predict carcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity? II. Construction and analysis of a consolidated database.
    Kirkland D; Zeiger E; Madia F; Corvi R
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2014 Dec; 775-776():69-80. PubMed ID: 25435357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Synergy between systemic toxicity and genotoxicity: relevance to human cancer risk.
    Rosenkranz HS
    Mutat Res; 2003 Aug; 529(1-2):117-27. PubMed ID: 12943925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of genotoxicity assays in the regulation of chemicals in The Netherlands: considerations and experiences.
    Kramers PG; Knaap AG; van der Heijden CA; Taalman RD; Mohn GR
    Mutagenesis; 1991 Nov; 6(6):487-93. PubMed ID: 1800896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.